MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Michael Brush

Company Focus7/22/2009 12:01 AM ET

Emerging markets will lead us back

While the US chases 'green shoots,' India and China are booming. But Americans' years-long consumer-spending spree could be the catalyst for a global recovery.

By Michael Brush
MSN Money

Pessimists like to gloat that what we're seeing in this recession is U.S. consumers getting their comeuppance.

Decades of reckless borrowing peaked two years ago and has since started tumbling down, wrecking the economy along with it.

All we have to show for it now are piles of unwanted stuff, bigger piles of debt and over-mortgaged homes, and we could be left with ho-hum economic growth for years.

But this bleak view overlooks a big piece of today's global economy: U.S. consumers were, in one sense, making a huge investment in the economies of emerging-world countries as we purchased their stuff.

Now that investment should pay off. Emerging economies are starting to truly emerge as economic powerhouses, with some already casting off the global recession and posting strong growth. Take stocks, for example: Even after a strong rally, the U.S. market is merely about even this year. China's market is up 27%. India's is up 48%.

The good news: This will help the U.S. bounce back, perhaps more strongly than most anticipate, as a world of new consumers starts buying our stuff. The risk, at least if you're nationalistically minded: Though the U.S. may not lose its leadership role in the global economy, its superiority will dwindle.

Decoupled prosperity

Recent news of robust growth in places such as China and India confirms that emerging markets are on an economic path of their own, relying less on support from U.S. customers. This is the theoretical decoupling that many economists had buzzed about, then dismissed as the world followed the U.S. into recession.

It turns out that decoupling is real.

Next, expect consumers in these emerging economies to start buying more stuff made in the U.S., nudging the U.S. back to "normal" growth of 3% to 3.5% per year sooner than many people expect, says James Paulsen, an economist and market strategist with Wells Fargo.

And that is how the "investments" made by U.S. consumers will pay off. Our spending helped them build up industries, creating jobs and consumers -- who now can turn around and buy from us.

To be sure, emerging-market economies deserve credit, too. Most of their financial institutions steered clear of the credit-market mess that has crippled the more advanced economies of the U.S. and Europe, says Cristina Panait, who follows emerging markets as a portfolio manager of the Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PYEMX).

But here's a closer look at how the U.S. consumer helped create this boom.

A second Marshall Plan

After World War II, the U.S. channeled $13 billion to Europe for rebuilding, recognizing that we needed the region as a trading partner. That's about $115 billion in today's dollars.

The payoff came in the 1950s and 1960s, when European demands for our stuff contributed to robust U.S. economic growth. This ingenious strategy was called the Marshall Plan, named after then-Secretary of State George Marshall, who played a key role in developing it.

Now the U.S. is starting to benefit from an unofficial Marshall Plan set in motion by U.S. consumers over the past 15 years, Paulsen believes. As U.S. consumers binged, a lot of what they bought came from factories in China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam and other emerging-world countries. During this time, the U.S. ran trade deficits of about $650 billion a year, Paulsen estimates. That means we spent that much more abroad than foreigners bought from us.

That money helped emerging-market nations build out their infrastructure. It paid the salaries that fueled the growth of now-thriving middle classes. "We ran trade deficits for the better part of a decade and a half, and that amounts to a constant investment in these economies," Paulsen says. The result was a "new world consumer, with wants, desires and savings."

Trade deficits were criticized along the way as a sign the U.S. was living beyond its means. But the payoff may be coming soon.

Some big changes

Here are some numbers that give a sense of the changes that U.S. consumers helped bring about in the emerging world:

  • In China, about 400 million people have risen above poverty since the late 1970s. And 150 million of them now have manufacturing jobs -- a group nearly the size of the entire U.S. work force, says Fred Fraenkel, the chairman of investment policy for Beacon Trust. An additional 200 million Chinese should rise above poverty in the next five to 10 years, he estimates. The size of the middle class has likewise been rising dramatically throughout the developing world. "This is moving so fast . . . that it's hard to comprehend," Fraenkel says.

  • One way to grasp the big picture is to consider how sharply the emerging-market share of world gross domestic product has risen. Developing economies accounted for 45% of world GDP last year, up from 37% in 2000, says Panait, of investment firm Payden & Rygel. The value of emerging-market contribution to world GDP rose to $30.9 trillion in 2008 from $15.5 trillion in 2000.

  • Emerging-market customers are now buying much more of our stuff. Developing countries bought 35% of the $1.3 trillion worth of U.S. exports in 2008, according to Franklin Vargo of the National Association of Manufacturers. That's up from 25% in 1990. China was the largest, with $70 billion in purchases, followed by Brazil, Singapore and Taiwan. They buy agricultural products but also significant amounts of manufactured goods. (See "The myth of U.S. industry's demise" for more.)

Continued: Guidance for investors now

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh