Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,169.18
S&Punch0.00%
1,105.65

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .

MSN Money poll

  1. Do you pay for your health insurance?

Vote to see results

Click here to see results without voting

  1. Do you pay for your health insurance?
    1. Yes -- I am self-insured.
      8%
    2. Partially -- my employer pays part of the bill.
      44%
    3. No -- my employer covers me 100%.
      42%
    4. I'm uninsured.
      5%
    5. Other.
      1%
1118 responses, not scientifically valid, results updated every minute.
Workers' health costs up 34% in 3 years © Corbis

The Basics

Workers' health costs up 34% in 3 years

With rising deductibles, co-payments and other expenses driving up out-of-pocket costs, you could be underinsured even if you have coverage through your job.

By MarketWatch

Americans with job-based health insurance saw their protection from higher out-of-pocket costs erode between 2004 and 2007, especially those who were sick and of modest means, according to a new study.

The majority of people with health insurance, about 160 million Americans, receive it through their jobs.

"American families with employer-based coverage were worse off in 2007 than they were in 2004," said Jon Gabel, the lead author of the study, which was published June 2 on the Web site of medical journal Health Affairs (.pdf file). "This is during a period of time when the economy was expanding."

The authors concluded that a growing number of people are underinsured, a term that refers only to what they pay out of pocket for medical services. Health care affordability, which includes out-of-pocket costs plus employees' premium contributions, also has taken a big hit.

Comparing expected health spending among different types of health plans, financial protection was greatest for those in health maintenance organizations, or HMOs, the study found. Of five chronic conditions surveyed, patients with breast cancer suffered the highest out-of-pocket costs.

Workers faced an annual average of $729 in medical-services costs in 2007, including deductibles and other forms of cost-sharing, such as co-payments and co-insurance. That was up 34% from 2004, when the average out-of-pocket burden for those with employer coverage was $545.

Job-based health plans picked up 80% of total costs in 2007, covering a slightly smaller percentage of overall expenses than they did in 2004. More workers confronted plans with deductibles, and deductible levels were set higher, according to the study. But the main reason for rising out-of-pocket costs was the growth in overall health spending.

20% co-pay seems low, unless you have cancer

The report showed a widening gap between adults who need to tap their health insurance to cover medical visits and those fortunate enough not to have much need of their benefits. Adults with chronic medical conditions drove higher spending for both themselves and their health plans.

At the two extremes, the average out-of-pocket expense for the 50% of workers with the lowest health spending grew 23% to $85 in 2007. But expenses jumped 42% to $8,703 among the highest-spending 1% of workers, the study found. For the highest spending 10% of workers, the average out-of-pocket costs amounted to $3,364, an increase of 39% from 2004.

Video on MSN Money

What your hospital won't tell you © NBC
What your hospital won't tell you
'Today' show co-host Matt Lauer talks with NBC News' chief medical editor, Dr. Nancy Snyderman, about unlocking hospitals' hidden truths, from insurance plans to medical errors.

For some patients, co-insurance may seem like a small sum -- set at 10% or 20%, for example, when services are from an in-network health provider -- but costs can add up quickly as absolute dollar figures rise. The study found that insurance paid for 84% of the bill for five selected chronic conditions: asthma, breast cancer, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension.

Continued: Sticker shock for breast-cancer patients

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 5 of 5
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 5:57:03 AM
We quote out our companies policy ever year. But we only have 19 employees, so our choices are bad and worse. The premiums keep going up, deductibles keep going up. I have employees, including myself, that can't afford treatment even AFTER spending $18K a year for premiums.
These people who keep saying 'go somewhere else' must either be rich or working for a large corporation. Home Depot gets a 10X better policy for about 30% of what we're paying. Because they have thousands of employees under the same plan. If nothing else happens, the rules need to change on that front. Let every, say, paralegal, sign up under one plan. Save them thousands on premiums. Each office with only a handful of paralegals vs thousands of paralegals in one state. Let every insurance agency sign up under one plan. Again, thousands vs each office have to pay much higher premiums. Go by career instead of individual corporations. That's how the Unions do it.
I'm not against capitalism, but when a CEO takes home $12M bonus for letting children die of treatable diseases by denying coverage, I feel health insurance should be taken OUT of the profit making world. It's no better then blood diamonds. They make money by killing people.

Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:01:44 PM
Everyone deserves health insurance!  Congress, give us Single Payer NOW!!!!
Saturday, July 25, 2009 7:51:49 PM
This is a very complicated issue, but I think it is pretty obvious that this country definitely needs to reform our health care system.  Whether the government should once again be involved in this?  I don't know....government health care programs already exist; Medicare, Medicaid, Veteran's plans.  It's just too bad that the bigwigs who make the most money are going to fight like hell to prevent a single payer system...which is the LEAST we should have; next thing we should have are fee limits on services.  For example: Instead of a CT scan costing 3000 bucks, the negotiated and agreed upon fee is 1000.  Most of our health care costs are tied up in administrative costs anyway.  Did anyone ever look into how much hospital CEO's make?  Interesting stuff. 
Friday, September 25, 2009 4:37:08 PM
Cut healthcare insurance 30% by making it not for profit and single payer.
Saturday, October 10, 2009 5:51:44 PM

Congress and the president need to go back to the drawing board. We need a single payer plan like medicare for all. Here's a group of doctors who are in favor of single payer health care.

http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single_payer_resources.php

1 - 5 of 5
To add a comment, pleasesign in