Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,169.18
S&Punch0.00%
1,105.65

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .

MSN Money poll

  1. Does Congress need to step in and reform our nation's health care system?

Vote to see results

Click here to see results without voting

  1. Does Congress need to step in and reform our nation's health care system?
    1. Yes -- the system is broken.
      58%
    2. No -- government meddling will only make things worse.
      38%
    3. I don't know.
      4%
2160 responses, not scientifically valid, results updated every minute.
Liz Pulliam Weston

The Basics

It's not health care reform unless . . .

Don't get distracted by the histrionics on TV or the near riots at town hall meetings. For Main Street America, only 3 things matter.

By Liz Pulliam Weston
MSN Money

Lawmakers and pundits want to make the health care fight all about politics.

But their red faces and finger-pointing can't obscure the fact that our health insurance system is simply broken. People are going broke and/or dying prematurely.

This isn't about politics. This is about lives.

Right now, big chunks of the U.S. population lack adequate coverage, and many more are just pink slips away from life-altering medical bills. Consider:

  • Nearly 40% of Americans between 18 and 64 had no insurance or had coverage so paltry they were exposed to catastrophic expenses, according to a 2007 survey by Consumer Reports.

  • About 62% percent of all bankruptcies filed in 2007 were linked to medical expenses, according to a recent study by Harvard researchers. The vast majority of people who went bankrupt had health insurance when their illnesses or injuries occurred.

  • Meanwhile, the cost of coverage continues to spiral, with no end in sight. Premiums for employer-provided health insurance have more than doubled in the past decade, to $12,680 annually for family coverage (employees on average pay $3,354 of the bill, with the employer covering the rest), according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. The Commonwealth Fund predicts that, without containment, the cost will double again by 2020. High cost was the reason cited by half the small businesses that have dropped coverage in recent years.

  • And it's not just about money. If you're uninsured, you're at least 1.2 times more likely to die than if you had coverage. The mortality rate rises to 1.5 times for babies, as I wrote in "A survival guide for the uninsured."

As the debate over reform has become increasingly bitter -- and occasionally bizarre, as evidenced by the citizen who told Rep. Bob Inglis, R-S.C., to "keep your government hands off my Medicare" -- it would be easy for lawmakers to lose sight of just how much financial risk the average person faces if nothing changes or if reform favors corporate interests over our own.

Any changes that would truly matter would have to come through in three areas: availability, affordability and reliability.

Here's what needs to happen, no matter whose plan is eventually adopted. If you don't see these three fundamental changes, "reform" is unlikely to do you and your family much good.

Coverage has to be available for all

Even if you have good coverage now, you could easily lose it if you're under 65 and not covered by Medicare. If your coverage is through your company, your employer could simply decide to stop providing this benefit, as many small businesses already have, or you could lose your job and your insurance along with it. (You're supposed to be able to buy continuing coverage under federal COBRA laws, but that's too expensive for many families, as I'll explain in the next section.)

Buying coverage on your own can be tough. Insurers typically won't cover people with serious existing health problems, and even minor illnesses or conditions can drive up the cost. If you're healthy, you're not out of the woods: You may pay more if your parents or other close relatives had health issues.

Video: Health insurers set up shop at malls

You don't have much choice when it comes to private coverage either. Most states' markets are dominated by one or two insurers. There's little of the competition that might induce an insurer to extend coverage to riskier applicants or keep down costs.

True reform would allow you to get guaranteed coverage if you lost your job, quit to start a business or decided to retire early.

Some say the best way to ensure access is to provide a public or nonprofit option that could compete with private insurers.

Insurers hate that idea, and to avoid it they promise they'll start covering everyone if everyone is required to buy insurance from them. But that approach has its own hazards.

Continued: Coverage must be affordable

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 271
Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:45:20 PM

You must pay for your own healthcare.  A family of 3 making 35k is most likely elligable for medicaid now, it depends on the state. 

The reason for the bankrupsies is that the risk associated with bankrupsy is lower than the reward of not having to pay your bills. 

I also find that 40% of Americans statistic in the article.  The total number of uninsured US CITIZENS that can not afford coverage is 10-15 million.  This is about 5% or so.

Finally, YOUR EMPLOYER pays ZERO, THAT IS PART OF YOUR SALARY.  If it is important to you then you have to keep that amount in your emergency fund. 

Healthcare is labor intensive, Nurses earn a good wage and they deserve it like most other healthcare professionals.  You have to be willint to pay for the wage of someone else, and you must pay your own way. 

Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:55:18 PM

None are easy. But reducing costs is probably the toughest of all, particularly in light of the first three.

But there are plenty of other cost-saving proposals that have been put forth by Congress and the Obama administration.

Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:57:28 PM

Comprehensive health care reform can no longer wait. Rapidly escalating health care costs are crushing family, business, and government budgets. Employer-sponsored health insurance premiums have doubled in the last 9 years, a rate 3 times faster than cumulative wage increases. This forces families to sit around the kitchen table to make impossible choices between paying rent or paying health premiums. Given all that we spend on health care, American families should not be presented with that choice. The United States spent approximately $2.2 trillion on health care in 2007, or $7,421 per person – nearly twice the average of other developed nations. Americans spend more on health care than on housing or food. If rapid health cost growth persists, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that by 2025, one out of every four dollars in our national economy will be tied up in the health system. This growing burden will limit other investments and priorities that are needed to grow our economy. Rising health care costs also affect our economic competitiveness in the global economy, as American companies compete against companies in other countries that have dramatically lower health care costs.

Wednesday, September 09, 2009 10:03:02 PM

Here is an interesting perspective - and it make a great deal of sense:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WnS96NVlMI

 

Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:18:50 AM
It sounds good to say 'your employer pays zero because it is part of your salary; however, in reality employees are paying more for the same or less coverage than they had when originally hired. Therefore, their salaries are going down and they have less disposable income for other necessities like food, shelter, etc.
Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:31:18 AM
When I see my doctor, he has his computer ready and records most all that is said. It's like his lawyer is there with us. Trial lawyers have helped ruin Medicare. Although I generally like Liz, she says nothing about tort reform--which will never happen with this bunch in Washington.
Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:38:40 AM

eng_steve; that the employer pays ZERO is incorrect. They do, however, simply pass the costs on to the consumer in the price of their product. If ALL business had to pay equal per-employee costs, this would not matter, but since they don't, it becomes an issue to contain these costs to be competitive with rivals that are not paying similarly.

In fact, a more "capitalist" (and somewhat less noticeable) approach to subsidizing healthcare would be to have ALL businesses (including government) pay an equal per-employee price (regardless of full or part-time status) and guaranteed coverage by insurers who can sell nationwide, without government restriction

This way, the people who spend the most (the ones with money to spend) carry the greater "share" simply by spending that money - those without spendable income therefore support the lesser "share". Rather than arbitrary divisions according to some junior-executive-assistant-deputy with ten-year-old data, we can have a more automatic - and accurate - distribution.

We may also phase out the need for MediCare.

 

This WILL reduce the need for more hundreds of government employees, though.

Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:46:39 AM
Gee, if you could purchase health insurance across state lines, maybe the premiums would go down because you would have more choices of providers.  This is a case where government regulation needs to be removed.
Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:47:49 AM
You are a typical selfish neo con who has insurance. Your attitude is "I have mine, the reason you don't have yours is that you made poor choices". That is totally myopic. In this recession many hard working people have lost their jobs.
The government bailed out big banks and Wall Street, what has that gotten the American public?
 Credit has dried up.
We are still mired in Iraq and are expanding into Afghanistan - on borrowed money. 
Which is the best choice, to stay the course in Afghanistan and Iraq, or come home and use what little money we have to improve the health of our own citizens. Almost 50% of the U.S. budget goes for defense. Why have the radical ignoramuses not had "Tea Parties" opposing the wars?

Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:49:25 AM
Would someone please tell me of another country that has at present a better health care system than the U.S. ? 
1 - 10 of 271
To add a comment, pleasesign in