Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Car © Image Source/Corbis

Extra11/20/2009 5:04 PM ET

Toyota, safety group squabble over ratings

The automaker objects to being left off a list of the safest vehicles, saying the exclusion is 'extreme and misleading.' The tester defends its methods.

By Insure.com

Toyota and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) traded words this week in a dust-up over the testing institute's 2010 Top Safety Picks awards list.

The IIHS announced its winners Wednesday and noted that Toyota didn't have a single model in the list: "Toyota and its Lexus and Scion subsidiaries had a strong showing in 2009 with 11 winners but were shut out for 2010," the institute said.

Firing back, Toyota issued a statement the same day, reacting to IIHS' news release and its comments on Toyota that the institute put under the subheading "Missing the mark."

"IIHS' statement that Toyota was shut out for 2010 is extreme and misleading, considering there are 38 Toyota, Lexus and Scion models, and only three were tested for roof strength by IIHS: Camry, RAV4 and Yaris," the automaker said.

No Toyotas offered

IIHS Senior Vice President Anne Fleming said Thursday that she wasn't surprised by the response. "This is the way automakers often react," she said, and called Toyota's statement disingenuous.

"We told every automaker, including Toyota, there would be this new criterion for roof strength and to flag the vehicles that they would like us to test," Fleming said. "Toyota did not come forth with any requests. Usually the reason automakers don't flag vehicles is they know the vehicles wouldn't pass."

Nineteen cars and eight SUVs made the IIHS top-pick list for 2010, the first year that winning a spot also required good performance in a roof strength test to measure protection in a rollover.

Winners also had to earn a "good" rating for protecting people in front, side and rear crashes, as well as for electronic stability control, which research shows significantly reduces crash risk. This was the second time IIHS raised the bar for winners since naming its first Top Safety Pick winners, in 2005.

Not all models tested

The institute says that because of time constraints, it can't test every vehicle on the market in the first year after adopting a new safety criterion. So it selects groups of models to test and asks each automaker to flag any other of its vehicles it wants tested for consideration. This year, IIHS tested all small SUVs and midsized cars for roof strength and any other models automakers suggested.

Fleming said the institute routinely gets requests to test particular models, but she couldn't say whether most automakers make testing requests. The institute is open with automakers about its testing criteria, and manufacturers' representatives are welcome to come, and are usually present when their vehicles are tested, she said.

Video: The safest new vehicles on the road

Toyota's small SUV, the RAV4, earned an "acceptable" grade for roof strength -- not good enough to win a Top Safety Pick spot. Its midsize vehicle, the Camry, earned a good rating under the new criterion, but rated marginal for protection against whiplash injury in rear-crash safety testing.

Like Toyota, four other previous winners didn't win spots this year: BMW, Mazda, Mitsubishi and Saab.

In its statement, Toyota noted that all its vehicles meet or exceed federal safety standards for front and side impact, roof-crush resistance and rollover protection.

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

Car insurance prices are not affected by crash-test results, but the tests can help consumers compare models when shopping for new cars. Car insurance companies set rates based on a model's claims history rather than on crash tests.

This article was reported by Barbara Marquand for Insure.com.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 421
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:07:30 PM
Take responsibility toyota. It's your own fault for not makeing the list.
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:11:54 PM

TOYOTA 

From those wonderful people who brought you Pearl Harbour

Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:12:55 PM
I own a 2007 Rav4 and lease a 2009 Corolla and in my opinion Toyota is losing its way. A typical reflection of a company who head has gotten too big.
I will probably not buy or lease another Toyota again. I have not had significant problems with either vehicle. But both don't impress me with function or at times with quality. It's the little things like wheels that are rusting (toyota will not do anything about them) or the over sensitive steering on the Corolla which is a complaint by many. Yes, they are good solid basic transportation. But they cost too much just for that.  These safety points only enforce the basic's of safety too.
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:13:34 PM
WOW!  Is Toyota going to start making Fighter Jets for Japan!
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:13:50 PM
Maybe people will begin to understand that some of the best cars made are and have been made right here in the USA
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:15:32 PM
Ha Ha and Ha!  Welcome to the big leagues boys! Great year your having.  First the brake recall, then the sticking throttle, and now this.  Hats off to Toyota!  Now go to the cornor and pout.
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:16:19 PM
It`s hard to be humble, when you`re perfect in every way. Good Ole` Toyota ! It`s hard to stay #1 too. Got to give Chevy credit they invented keeping SCORE !!!! You can`t keep a good man down. Way to go USA!!!!
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:20:16 PM
Gee, Toyota wanted to be an "American" car company. Now they know what it feels like!
#9
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:21:20 PM
Funny how the rules did not change and now they cry foul. The company that had more recalls than cars sold has the stones to actually complain. I hope you C E O catches the crabs.
Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:22:53 PM

Open-mouthed I am very glad to see an honest test result showing that the Japan auto makers vehicles are not as safe as they have stated. As a retired Ford Motor Company employee i have seen those auto makers come to see our operations and steal production methods and assembly methods every time that they entered our different plants.I would like to bring to the attention of all American citizens that Japan and other countries like China could

not beat us in previous wars,so now their consentrateing on beating us by distroying the American economy and our standard

of living.

1 - 10 of 421
To add a comment, pleasesign in