Could Breathalyzers become standard in cars? © Michael Allen Jones/Sacramento Bee/ZUMAPress)

The Basics

A Breathalyzer in every car?

More than a dozen states require ignition-blocking devices for all DUI offenders. Could this tool for fighting drunken driving become standard equipment?

By Insure.com

Most of us go through a short mental checklist when we get behind the wheel of our cars.

Seat belt? Check. Kids belted in? Check. Rearview mirror adjusted? Check.

But some drivers have one more step: blowing into a device attached to the inside of their cars that determines whether they are sober. If they have been drinking alcohol -- even a sip -- their cars will not start.

New York was the most recent state to enact a law forcing anyone with a drunken-driving conviction to have a breath analyzer installed in his or her car. New York has joined 13 other states that mandate the on-board breath analyzers, called ignition interlocks, for all DUI offenders (first-time and repeat offenders) and is one of 47 states that employ the devices in order to reduce repeat DUI offenses. In some states, the interlocks are the only way convicted DUI offenders can get back their licenses.

Do on-board breath analyzers work?

Several studies have found that use of the ignition interlock devices reduces the risk of repeat offenses by as much as 65%.

According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, while some states require all DUI offenders to have car breath analyzers, many others allow drivers to get back their suspended licenses after DUIs if they agree to have the devices installed.

New Jersey requires DUI offenders to have the devices installed in their cars even if the offenders don't want to drive anymore -- assuming they don't sell their cars.

"Many (DUI offenders) end up driving anyway, even without insurance or a valid driver's license, so this is just an added safeguard," says Marc Bergman, the director of field operations for Smart Start, which sells interlock devices around the country.

New Mexico, in 2005, was the first state to mandate interlock devices for repeat DUI offenders, and as of late 2008 there were more than 130,000 ignition interlock devices working in 45 states, the Los Angeles Times reported.

A device costs a DUI offender up to $200 to install and requires the driver to pay a monthly service fee of up to $100. The device has to remain in the offender's vehicle for a period of time that is usually determined by the severity of the offense. In Florida, for instance, the courts can order you to install a device for at least two years if it's your third DUI or if you had a child under age 15 in the car when you drove drunk.

Thwarting interlock cheaters

As you can imagine, some DUI offenders try to outsmart the devices. For instance, say a DUI offender has had a few drinks at a bar and then needs to drive home. What's to stop him from offering to pay a stranger $20 to blow into his interlock device?

Bergman, who sells interlock devices in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island, says the devices have become sophisticated enough to stymie even a "technical wizard" who is trying to defeat it. Some features include:

  • Taking a picture of every test to catch drivers who persuade other people to blow into their devices for them.

  • Forcing the driver to hum into the breathing tube so the device knows it's measuring a human being and not, say, a leaf blower.

  • Requiring random tests to prevent drivers from drinking after they start driving or letting their cars idle while they sit inside bars. Washington's Department of Licensing calls these "rolling retests."

  • Hard-wiring to the horn and headlights, both of which are activated in a heart-stopping frenzy if you try to bypass the system.

The devices are calibrated to detect even low levels of alcohol -- mouthwash can cause a failed test -- because convicted drunken drivers are prohibited from driving with any alcohol in their systems. You're not advised to take a test with a severe hangover either – lingering alcohol will cause you to fail the test.

Interlock companies send the data collected by the devices to designated authorities, such as district attorneys or probation officers. In some states, multiple failures can cause you to lose your license again or force you to keep a device installed longer.

Continued: DUI car insurance causes sticker shock 

More from MSN Money

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh
Insure.com on MSN Money
236Comments
11/30/2010 6:56 PM
avatar

I agree that this is a complete scam just like any traffic ticket ever or anything that government ever came up with. In California a cop was just busted while drinking on duty in his patrol car. I think he had 5 beers. Also a city council member was arrested at a checkpoint for dui a few months back. I wonder if they will get a device in their personal cars & be required to pay all those fines. Probably not. I remember as a kid I got pulled over a few times just cause I guess they wanted to mess with someone. The first time I had not even touched alcohol or weed yet, I made an illegal u turn cause I was tired & didn't want to circle the block.  I told them that yet I was accused of being high & drunk & they always threatend to arrest me. They never have so far. Other times I got phony tickets just cause cops are too lazy to do anything.  IF WE ARE GOING TO STOP THIS, WE NEED TO FIGHT NOW & GET RID OF GOVERNMENT BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE. MEN LIKE TIMOTHY MCVEIGH KNEW WHO OUR TRUE ENEMY IS & WAS MAN ENOUGH TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. NOW WE MUST BEFORE ALL IS LOST.

11/30/2010 1:01 PM
avatar
the interlock devices are a good thing to have in your car for your safety and others. But they do need to do some improvements to there systems i have one in my car and i live in alaska were it freezing 17 degrees out right now and the autostart wont start the car. So Ihave to go out and start the car when and sit in the car waiting for a rolling test to go offf then I can go back in side. anywhere from 1-15 min of waiting. But overall a good thing to have in your car and it only detects booze not grass !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
11/30/2010 11:07 AM
avatar

Forcing everyone to have an interlock in there car is like forcing everyone to wear a seatbelt. it goes against our basic human rights. Its damned ironic to because they say we are all free equal, and have the same rights. But just by even suggesting that law let alone puting it into effect they have said we can't be trusted with making our own decisions. That as lawmakers they are better than us. Also I do wear my seatbelt. I don't drink and drive, and I don't smoke. I'm just sick of being told I can't do this and I can't do that.

11/30/2010 8:27 AM
avatar
I partially really like this Idea, If they could make it a little more advanced, to where it detects when you are actually over the legal limit vs just having one drink, and of course lowering the "maintenance cost" or elimiminating it, I would be all for it. All you people that are already complaining about this are obviously the people that sit there and shake your head and swear at the news when an other drunk driver kills either themselves or some innocent mother with her two children in the car, and then run out to a bar get plastered and drive home still thinking your rotten, useless, self is still better than everybody. This could save lives! Get over yourself and do something good for somebody other than you!
11/30/2010 7:00 AM
avatar
Ok..How about this for an easier solution.  If you are convicted of a DUI, your drivers license is flagged.  When you go to buy ANY alcohol, the seller (bars included) must swipe your license through a reader in order to complete the sale.  If you license is flagged, then you are not permitted to purchase any alcohol.  If a seller is found violating the policy, then the establishment is fined and risks the potential to lose their permit to sell.

The interlock would be a good mechanism to catch the large percentage who have not been arrested before but chose to drive drunk as long as some way was found not to have to blow into the tube.

As someone who has had a family member get two DUI's (never an accident or any injury), the interlock idea would have prevented the arrests and the costs.   We opted to sell the car to avoid having to pay the several thousand dollars to have the interlock installed and maintained for a year.

My family member is one of the thousands who have decided NOT to drive anymore and I am thankful for that decision.

avatar
this is all bu...t all they want its money they dont care about you all they worry about its money some drivers drive better under the influence  then the drivers on the cell phone and laptop and other electronic bu...t  on use while they are driving so dont talk to me about this bu...t machines all this rich people want is to be in control of your private life by testing this stupid machine like if you where an animal.  i drive a bus and i see all this big excecutives texting on their cell phones and using laptop while driving and talking its crazy,  so what machine are they going to use for this people crazy people.
11/30/2010 3:24 AM
avatar
buy a different car to drive drunk
11/10/2010 12:33 PM
avatar
Prohibition is on its way again !!!
11/10/2010 10:54 AM
avatar
If it is against the law to have even one drink and then drive a vehichle why are there such huge parking lots in front of bars?
11/10/2010 9:53 AM
avatar

I read this whole article, didn't really hear anything I didn't already know.  UNTIL, they got to the real point (which isn't about safety).  $200 bucks for the device, then $100 bucks a month for maintenance?????  What maintenance???  Is there somebody who comes out to calibrate it once a month or something? 

 

Money Money Money Money Money Money Money Money!!!!!

 

Wake up people!  You'll stand in front of an army & proclaim your love for another man (or woman) and you'll fight for the color you were coincidently born into.....What about all this friggin' money!!!!  They're leaches!!!  Sucking the life out of everyone in any way they can, and what do we get out of the deal, some half a$$ paved roads, so that we have the opportunity & priveledge to drive to work, (so you can give them some income tax money, then spend that money & pay some sales tax, then hopefully, just hopefully you don't get a ticket on the way to do that, THERE GOES YOUR WHOLE PAYCHECK!)

 

We now work 3 months of the year STRICTLY for the government!  Enough already!  Who gives a crap if it's for a good cause, enough enough enough!

10/25/2010 7:51 PM
avatar
It's funny how they write these laws, a pocket knife blade longer than three inches is illegal, BUT THEY allow it to be sold. Something wrong with this whole picture. I smell a rat(s).
10/25/2010 7:46 PM
avatar
I have a better idea. Before you leave the bar you have to do a breathilyzer. See how that works. Since its illegal to drive , walk ride a bike of your lamwn mower after drinking, the bar has to provide sleeping quarters for you till you sober up!!
10/25/2010 7:41 PM
avatar
Hey UMM what, I did walk and they still got me!!
10/25/2010 7:37 PM
avatar
I say that this is rediculious. One drink and your car wont start. See how that works for the tax revenues. I do not advocate that anyone drive drunk. This has all gotten out of control, or has it. No different than cigarettes, they have turned it into big business. If you dont want people drinking and driving then close the bars. See how tha works for ya. Billions lost in tax revenues. Just dont make sense. We dont want it but we want the money that it generates. Its coming and you can forget the drinks with your dinner!!
10/20/2010 4:44 AM
avatar
I AGREE WITH LODSCHOOL ....I HAVE TO BECAUSE  I AM IN THE SAME SITUATION
10/14/2010 2:16 PM
avatar
In other words, treating all people like criminals before they've done anything wrong?  I'll tell Big Brother where to stick that Breathalyzer...
10/02/2010 8:25 AM
avatar
I like 1superdave1's comment about the cell phones and not being able to use one in a car unless it is in park and the key off. As for drinking and driving - high fines for first offenders, high fine and no less than 1 year in jail, 3rd time 10 to 20 years.
9/28/2010 6:27 PM
avatar

 I am currently using an interlock device, because I wasn't smart enough to take a cab, walk or call someone for a ride. I caused my own situation not the law, police officer or judge. I have learned my lesson and can also say thankfully that during my driving while intoxicated times, I never caused an accident or hurt someone. Having to use the interlock device is a mere inconvenience, compared to not being able to drive. To anyone out there, rest assured you cannot tamper with it in any way, in my state if you get caught tampering with the device, even if you do not own the car, it lead's to 10 more year's loss of license, a $10,000 fine and 1 to 2 years in jail.

As far as using someone else's car, without an interlock device installed, if I get caught, jail time and fine's for me, even if I am not under the influence and for the owner of the car I was driving, they receive a loss of their license, fine's and impounding of their car! Word's of wisdom, even if it was late for me, DON'T DRINK AND DRIVE!!, YOU could KILL SOMEBODY, it's EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE and they aren't TAKING IT LIGHTLY WITH THE LAW'S ANYMORE.

9/28/2010 5:42 PM
avatar

Not in every car, no way.  The government wants to control too much of an individuals life.

 

If you've received a DUI so be it but for people who aren't abusive or don't drink, no. 

 

Get out of our lives.

9/28/2010 2:55 PM
avatar

I'm 100% for keeping drunk drivers off the road, but I do NOT think having this device installed in every car is the answer. What we all need are cars with brains (more brains than the average idiot driver anyway) that can detect when you're driving dangerously. This would keep distracted/inattentive drivers, aggressive drivers, tired & falling asleep drivers, AND those DUI. So there; get workin' on it, stupid government! Do something right the first time for once in your history.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of ConductPlease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
Additional comments(optional)
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
viewCounter