Dow+30.69up+0.29%
10,464.40
Nasdaq+6.87up+0.32%
2,176.05
S&P+4.98up+0.45%
1,110.63

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Liz Pulliam Weston

The Basics

Can colleges keep promises of aid?

Many universities replaced loans with grants and otherwise worked to make college more affordable. But that was before once-hefty endowment funds started shrinking.

By Liz Pulliam Weston
MSN Money

The financial crisis may claim yet another victim: the nascent effort to make college education more affordable.

Fat endowments allowed dozens of universities to announce dramatic improvements in affordability. In recent years, schools took a variety of measures, including:

  • Replacing loans with grants in financial aid packages for lower- and middle-income families, either entirely or after students met a low cap on borrowing.
  • Eliminating parental contributions for lower- and middle-income families.
  • Waiving tuition entirely for lower-income students.

Princeton University launched the trend in 1998 by banishing loans from financial aid packages for low-income students, said college financing expert Mark Kantrowitz, editor of the FinAid Web site.

But the movement really took off after 2006, when the congressionally chartered Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance found that financial barriers, including excessive reliance on student loans in aid packages, were inhibiting lower-income students from attending and graduating from college. (You can read the committee's report, "Mortgaging Our Future: How Financial Barriers to College Undercut America's Global Competitiveness," in this .pdf file.)

The trend gained momentum in 2007, when influential Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, suggested colleges with big endowments be forced to spend at least 5% of their funds annually. To forestall such a requirement and remain competitive with their peers, wealthy colleges from Amherst to Yale proposed or increased measures to make their educations more affordable.

So far, Kantrowitz said, 67 colleges have adopted no-loan policies for at least some of their students, including 40% of all universities with endowments greater than $1 billion.

When the other shoe drops

Harvard, for example, jettisoned loans from all financial aid packages, eliminated parental contributions for families making up to $60,000 a year and limited tuition costs to no more than 10% of income for families making up to $180,000 a year.

The price tag for such generosity was affordable in the days when endowments gained an average 10% a year, as they did in 2005, 2006 and 2007, according to surveys by Commonfund Institute. High-flying funds, like Harvard's, often posted annual returns in excess of 20%.

Some of the growth was fueled by a plunge into alternative investments, such as hedge funds, private equity and venture capital -- strategies that made up 42% of the typical endowment fund's asset allocation in 2007, compared with the 23% that was invested in domestic stocks and 12% in fixed-income instruments.

That appetite for risk set up the funds for a shellacking when the financial crisis hit.

Today, universities are reeling from huge losses in their endowment funds. The average fund shrank 24.1% in the six months ended Dec. 31, 2008, according to Commonfund's benchmark survey.

Harvard's fund, the largest in the nation, became the poster child for the endowment debacle. Harvard's endowment lost 22% of its value, or $8 billion, in just four months last year, forcing the university to freeze hiring, slash budgets and put the $1.2 billion construction of a science complex on hold.

Some of the alternative investments that fueled past growth have been tough to value or sell since the financial crisis hit and investors retreated from risk, said John Griswold, Commonfund Institute's executive director.

How to pay for college

That has cut off many universities from a needed source of income and led to great uncertainty about what the endowments are really worth.

Both students and schools are scrambling

The chaos at endowment funds comes as financial need has soared. High unemployment rates, reduced portfolios and lower home values have made paying for education tough for many families.

So far, no university has backed off of its no-loan or tuition-waiver pledge, although some acknowledge considering the option. Swarthmore College's dean of admissions and financial aid recently told Bloomberg News that the school may not be able to offer loan-free packages to future students.

Continued: What you need to know

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

MSN Money Video

Saving For College Home

Saving For College (c) Stockdisc / SuperStockThe best ways to save for your child's college tuition.

Search for a Liz Pulliam Weston article by topic.

Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 8 of 8
Monday, August 31, 2009 9:39:11 AM
Our daughter is a Grad Student in the California University system and this year was denied the Grant she usually receives. She was told ALL Grants have been denied however her loan cap would be raised. So now she's had to borrow more money to cover her increased tuition fee, and only the UNSUBSIDIZED loan amount was raised by the government. Even though she works and with her student loans it's still difficult to make ends meet.
Monday, August 31, 2009 11:23:59 AM

Joker814: I suggest that your daughter tell the CA Univ. that she will not take out any loans and will stop paying tuition unless they come up with something better.  If they fail to respond, she should stop school for now and get a full time job.  Either find a co. that will pay or partial pay her tuition and go to school after hours, hundreds of thousands do this across America.  Or save her  money and pay cash for her future tuition.  Borrowing money to pay these colleges, particularly public institutions; merely serves to reward these predatory schools.  If the frenzied demand, driven by debt availability, is reduced by students and parents refusing to be duped; I expect the schools to lower tuition to affordable prices and forget about loans being "financial aid."  I call it, "financial hurt."

Good luck and remember: DO NOT borrow money for any reason.

 

Buddy

Monday, August 31, 2009 11:31:23 AM

There is no draft, at least not yet.  Therefore, it is possible for a student to work, save money, and pay cash for a period of school.  Then go back to work and save for another session.  They won't be drafted and sent to Viet Nam to lug a .30 caliber machine gun while out of school.  It may take longer, but when they graduate they will be the owner of themselves, not some dishonest bank who conned either them or their parents into going deeply into debt.

 

Another good choice is to join the US military and earn schooling benefits while making good money and serving America at the same time.  May discover that the US military is a fine career choice, too.

 

Buddy

Monday, August 31, 2009 12:27:20 PM

Telling students to stop school and go to work instead of taking out loans, isn't the greatest advise in this environment. There is a whole class of graduates who cant find jobs. Something the politicians don't talk about is we need to create 125,000 jobs a month, just to keep up with new people coming into the workforce. Also, if you are in your third or fourth year it is hard to walk away. Bottom line, universities are paying too much for Professors who don't really teach and too many unions have driven their costs up.

 

Too many groups are riding the education train at the cost of educating our students. Also a degree isn't always the best thing for everyone, look at Bill Gates as an example. There are a lot of Technical fields that create a lot of opportunities for people and you don't have to go in debt up to your neck. Also some big corporations will cover the costs of additional education for their employees, Allied Signal paid for two years of engineering courses for me. Of course I had to take them at night and work a full time job.

 

The key is for gov't to truly stimulate job creation and financing for small businesses, the people who create 80% of the jobs in this country. That isn't happening! Till it does, the economy is just going to drag along and more people will continue to lose jobs and investments will not grow. Imagine what it is going to be like when all the soldiers start coming home from Iraq, looking for jobs too? It will be 2011 before things start to get better and maybe 2012 if the Democrat's economic polcies are as bad as they are being protrayed. I still remember Jimmy Carter's  socialist policies from the late 70's and the high unemployement it caused along with super high interest rates. Anyone remember home loans at 16%,  credit cards at 28%, having to fill up your car on odd or even days, the legacy of what happens when you put politics ahead of economic reality.

Monday, August 31, 2009 4:36:56 PM
Much hasn't changed for the past years but the recession during the last quarter of 2008 has been a great deal of influence to the new changes in tax laws. Tough economic conditions such as a recession mean that the taxpayer should pay special attention to those changes because this change may greatly affect your finances.
Monday, August 31, 2009 4:37:39 PM
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Sad
Tuesday, September 01, 2009 4:41:54 PM

Per the article:

"Harvard's fund, the largest in the nation, became the poster child for the endowment debacle. Harvard's endowment lost 22% of its value."

And earlier:

"High-flying funds, like Harvard's, often posted annual returns in excess of 20%."

Unless my math is off... poor baby Harvard lost about 1.5 years worth of their risk growth gains this year... That seems to me like a great spilled milk excuse to cut people off of grant financing.

This is probably worse for other schools, but how many of them has risk incurring managers that earned, all told, more than they are loosing this last year.

#8
Thursday, September 03, 2009 4:07:43 AM

To me, the message should be: borrow as little as you have to . . . to get the degree you want. Shop around and go with the school that gives you the best deal.

 

Blaming the Democrats for our current economic mess is a bit like blaming the horse that fled the burning barn . . . Republicans (beginning with Reagan) started us down the road to ruinous deficits and irresponsible underregulation of financial institutions; Obama is attempting to clean up a 30-year mess he inherited.

1 - 8 of 8
To add a comment, pleasesign in