Dow+30.69up+0.29%
10,464.40
Nasdaq+6.87up+0.32%
2,176.05
S&P+4.98up+0.45%
1,110.63

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Children and money © JGI/Getty Images // Children and money © JGI/Getty Images

The Basics

Can you afford NOT to have a kid?

Child-rearing bills don't end for 18 years or more, but neither do the tax credits and deductions that can save you $60,000 on raising your little one.

By Gina Roberts-Grey
MSN Money

Many couples have put off plans to procreate.

The latest numbers from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services show that births hit a two-year low in 2008, dropping almost 10% nationally since 2006. California, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey and Ohio showed the biggest drops.

Historically, the nation's birthrate has risen and fallen with the economy, plunging to record lows during the Great Depression , booming in the post-World War II years, then dipping again during the stagflation-battered early 1970s.

Tiffany Seigler of Evanston, Ill., understands that uncertainty. "Even though we want them, we just can't afford to have kids," she says. "I hope we can someday, but right now, I just don't think we can."

Research isn't exactly reassuring. The Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, a division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, says a second child born in 2008 will cost middle-income parents $221,190 -- and that doesn't include college. (See "Raising your $221,000 baby.")

But some experts say we might be looking at the numbers from the wrong angle -- that the cost of a child is calculated unfairly unless it also factors in how much a child saves parents.

"This report is only providing one piece of the financial puzzle," says Clint A. Costa, a certified public accountant in Chicago. "It's not balanced with things like the tax credits and deductions parents might be eligible for."

The real bottom line

No one's suggesting you have a baby just to save on taxes, but Costa says things such as child care credits, dependent exemptions and child tax credits should be considered when prospective parents run the numbers. Taken together, they can knock about a third off the cost of raising a child.

Here's a rough breakdown of some numbers Costa says should be considered before hitting the snooze button on your biological clock:

Dependency exemption. Over the next 17 years, parents of a child born in 2009 can deduct at least $3,500 a year from their income, assuming the exemption remains unchanged. But it's likely to rise; Costa projects an average of $4,500 a year. If the parents are in the 25% tax bracket, that's a savings of $19,125. State exemptions vary, but even a $1,250 child exemption in a state with a 5% income tax rate would be worth $1,063 over 17 years.

  • Total savings: $20,188.

Child tax credit. The $1,000 child credit is a dollar-for-dollar reduction in taxes owed. Over a child's first 17 years, that's $17,000 saved. Local child tax credits also vary by state. New Yorkers, for example, can claim up to $333 a year.

  • Total savings: $22,661 (federal plus average state credit based on New York).

Video: Trouble managing family expenses?

Child and dependent care credits. Although many conditions apply, in general, most child care expenses qualify for an annual $600 per child federal credit until a child reaches age 13. This adds up to $7,800. States also cut parents a break. According to the Tax Policy Center of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, the average state credit (.pdf file) is $454 a year. That's $5,902 for 13 years. You can see what your state offers here.

  • Total savings: $13,702.

Continued: Parents tend to earn more

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 404
Friday, October 09, 2009 3:27:01 AM
Even more important--someday you may need that child to support you.  My father supported my grandmother in her old age.  Now the "kids" want to be "Kids" when they are 40.  There is something to be said for family members taking care of the old and the young.

Friday, October 09, 2009 6:51:48 AM
Babysit the neighbors kids for free....
Friday, October 09, 2009 7:15:14 AM
Does any of this factor in the cost of baseball, hockey, football, music and art classes etc. Many schools now have to charge for these activities now that funding for the schools have been cut.
Friday, October 09, 2009 7:21:51 AM
It's easy to have kids, but NOT so easy to raise them.
Friday, October 09, 2009 7:46:41 AM
Your article more or less encourages people to have children at the taxpayers expense. It is sad to think how we as a nation subsidize so many behaviors that do not benefit us all!
Friday, October 09, 2009 8:27:36 AM

Davensport5080 - you said it!  I'm tired of being disproportionally taxed for other peoples' breeding choices.  Don't say that it benefits us all - for every one that is well raised and turns out to be a law-abiding, employed, decent human being, there are plenty more that detract, not build, the quality of our society.  It doesn't take a village - your kid, your financial responsibility 100%.

 

tough times do not last - that's a risky assumption; even that expectation has fallen aside in Asian countries.

Friday, October 09, 2009 11:29:18 AM

while the article has some good points, there are other considerations. 

Parents make more money:  well, maybe men parents do, most women parents don't because they do the brunt of the sacrificing career for family thing.  Notable exceptions of course.

MSN is rife with articles about grown children continueing to rely on parents well past 18 nowadays, and no more tax deductions, not to mention helping support THEIR kids.  I know lots of older parents delaying their own retirements because of this.

I wouldn't be counting on kids to support you when you are older, maybe in the good old days, not as much today.  I work in a hospital and the percentage of kids able to support their parents is WAY down.Notable exceptions as usual, but I see far far more parents having to go into a nursing home rather than being helped by or moving in with their grown children.  Sad, but that is the trend.

"Being a parent makes people more responsible"  Don't even get me started.....

Getting tax breaks is about the lamest excuse for becoming a parent I know of.  If you are good parent material, you would do it regardless.  If you are not, a 70% tax break won't make you any better. 

 

 

Friday, October 09, 2009 11:58:15 AM

The thing this article doesn't take into account is human nauture.

 

Singles and childless couples tend to blow money on stuff they don't really need--stuff that doesn't really contribute to their happiness or well being. They tend not to save money or plan their finances for the long term. When people have kids, it gives them the kick in the pants they need to start saving for retirement and other goals. Obviously, there's a limit to this. But a reasonable argument can be made that one or two kids might actually be good for your wallet.

 

Having a kid or two might also give some people the kick in the pants they need to get focused on their careers, so they can earn more as well.

 

Friday, October 09, 2009 6:36:21 PM
Open-mouthedOpen-mouthed dont worry too much about the usa running out of kids. i see latinas pushing a carrier for kids on the streets. some have as many as four little ones or quatromom some are quintumom.Open-mouthedOpen-mouthed
Friday, October 09, 2009 6:57:26 PM
Um, maybe some people just don't want or even like kids that much. I am fine with my cats, dogs and husband. Please don't tell me to have a kid. Not everyone love changing dirty diapers and running after screaming kids, covered in snot and jam, all day long. I have other interests and AM NOT interested in having a kid, even if it means extra tax credits!
1 - 10 of 404
To add a comment, pleasesign in