Dow-14.28down-0.14%
10,318.16
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,146.04
S&Punch0.00%
1,091.38

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Mature graduate © Rob Melnychuk/Jupiterimages

Extra9/15/2009 12:01 AM ET

Will the Web kill colleges?

The cost pressures on many students and universities, coupled with technological advances, could relegate campuses and prepackaged education to the history books.

By Zephyr Teachout, The Big Money

Students starting school this year may be part of the last generation for which "going to college" means packing up, getting a dorm room and listening to tenured professors. Undergraduate education is on the verge of a radical reordering. Colleges, like newspapers, will be torn apart by new ways of sharing information enabled by the Internet. The business model that sustained private U.S. colleges can't survive.

The real force for change is the market: Online classes are simply cheaper to produce. Community colleges and for-profit education entrepreneurs are already experimenting with dorm-free, commute-free options. Distance-learning technology has just hit its stride after years of glitchy videoconferences, and it will keep improving. Innovators have yet to tap the potential of the aggregator to change the way students earn a degree -- much like the news business in 1999. And as major universities offer some core courses online, we'll see a cultural shift toward acceptance of what is still, in some circles, a "Phoenix U" joke.

It is hard to predict the precise pace of change, but it's possible that within 15 years most college credits will come from classes taken online. In 2007, nearly 4 million students took at least one online course, and the numbers are growing. Within a generation, college will be a mostly virtual experience for the average student. The Ivys will be much less affected than the middle tier and local schools. But colleges that depend on tuition and have no special brand will be hit hard. The recession will accelerate this trend as students become warier of taking on loans and state schools experiment after funding cuts.

This doesn't just mean a different way of learning: The funding of academic research, the culture of the academy and the institution of tenure are all threatened.

A model based on scarcity

Both newspapers and universities have traditionally relied on selling hard-to-come-by information. Newspapers touted advertising space next to breaking news, but now that advertisers find their customers on Craigslist and Cars.com, the main source of reporters' pay is vanishing. Colleges also sell information, with slightly different promises: degree programs that provide access to brilliant minds, training in the art of thinking and, ultimately, better jobs. As with newspapers, some of these features are now available elsewhere. You don't need to be in the classroom to see a slide or find links to books about the controversy around "Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe," and you don't need to be in the room to ask questions about the classifications of staff in the basics of hotel management. A student can already access videotaped lectures, full courses, free articles and openly available syllabi online -- as well as books that can be searched and borrowed from libraries around the world. The amount of structured information is already astounding, and in five or 10 years, the curious 18-year-old (or 54-year-old) will be able to find dozens of quality online "History of the Chinese Revolution" classes, complete with video lectures, syllabi, take-it-yourself tests, a bulletin board populated by other "students" and links to free academic literature.

But the demand for college isn't just about the yearning to learn; it's also motivated by the hope of getting a degree. Online qualifications cost a college less to provide. Schools don't need to rent the space, and the glut of Ph.D. students means they can pay instructors a fraction of the salary for a tenured professor, ask the instructors to work from home and assume that they will rely on shared syllabi instead of always developing their own. Those savings translate into cheaper tuition, and even before the recession, there was substantial evidence of unmet demand for cheaper college degrees. Of the students who drop out -- and bear in mind that half of all students never graduate -- many cite money as a major reason.

Online degrees are relatively inexpensive. (The in-state online "undergraduate completion" degree offered by the East Carolina University costs only $99 per credit hour; that's a base of $1,200 a year.) And the price will only dive in coming decades as more universities compete and entrepreneurial colleges remix online material and match it with online instruction by poorly paid graduate students and part-time instructors. Cost drives choice: A recent survey suggests that college cost is one of the top factors determining which schools students choose to attend.

Separating 'class' from 'college'

You can already see significant innovation in online education in some community colleges and for-profit institutions. The community colleges are working with limited resources to maximize their offerings through Internet aggregation. For-profit institutions appear to be capitalizing on the high demand for low-cost degrees and the fact that few public schools do much traditional marketing. (In researching this essay I signed up for a handful of online degree programs and have been hounded for the past three months by college marketers trying to persuade me that I really want that engineering degree at Devry University. Monroe College, meanwhile, is well-known to New York City commuters thanks to glossy ads plastered on many subway cars.)

Video: Harvard grows more billionaires

These entrepreneurs are a little like the early online news-sharers -- a blend of bloggers and listserv members, profit-seekers, tinkerers. Just like the new model of news separated "the article" from "the newspaper," the new model of college also will separate "the class" from "the college." Already, many degrees allow you to pay for each credit as you take it. Classes are increasingly taken credit by credit, instead of in bulk -- just as news, once read in one sitting, is now read article by article.

Continued: A cultural shift?

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

MSN Money Video

Cut College Costs

Cut College costs (c) CorbisLoans, grants, scholarships and aid; budget tips for students.
The Big Money
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 231
Monday, September 14, 2009 9:20:36 PM
The market is making a decision to not go the traditional route of college to earn a degree and I am glad, the hyperinflation of college tuition since the 70's has driven many middle class families into ridiculous amounts of debt that is unwarranted. The truth is that with 90% of the jobs we are going to learn the information hands on whether then by analysis of Neizsche's principles. What I find is that college education does not determine a person's level of success or character. Not having a college education results in society being cheap with you.
Monday, September 14, 2009 11:44:51 PM

 HEAR HEAR!!!  I always been wondering the same thing as well. When it comes to degrees that are more common and less difficult to obtain, taking it online in an online college seems to weight the same as doing it on campus in a "real" college. I mean it's the same degree right?

Tuesday, September 15, 2009 5:21:57 AM
Online education is the way to go. Attending college in person keeps getting unaffordable by the day. Every year university tuition fees goes up by 10-20% and wages go down by 5%. Its just impossible for a middle class person to send his kids to college. 
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 6:07:11 AM
Besides wasting an enormous amount of valuable time, classroom education is extremely inefficient. I have attended classes from time to time for sixty some years, and what stands out most in my mind is the lack of individual progression. I have always spent most of that classroom time listening to the "catch up" crowd. Where as, with individual progression, an individual can "move right along" where the "learning is easy" and "pause for better understanding" where there is a question or lack of understanding. Probably most everyone has reached the end more or less at the same time with individual progression, but much faster, because not everyone was slowed for each and every question by each and every student. The slow students will take longer to reach the end, but will have a more or less equal understanding of the subject. Which, of course, is beneficial to all, believe that or not.Open-mouthed
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 6:08:09 AM
Why not for business, admin and such?  Live teleconferenced classes are also good.  Don't know if I would want an all internet trained cardiac surgeon thoughTongue out
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 6:08:17 AM
Out of each recession springs something new.   Perhaps this time it will be hope that college is once again affordable.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 7:22:34 AM
If this ever did happen, it would be a disaster. I really doubt it will ever happen. Certainly, there will be online classes that will take the place of brick-and-mortar classes (this is already happening, together with hybrid classes). But there are very obvious problems with this model: 1) what do you do with courses in hard sciences? Do all of these people have to go out and buy their own lab equipment and lease time on an electron microscope? Some curriculum does not lend itself very well to online presentation. 2) When I went to school, I have to admit that I did not need my instructors very much. I teach part time to earn extra money, and I have noticed that most of the students in my classes would never make it in an online course of study. They barely make it with me in their faces pushing them along. It is not the right model for the majority of the students out there right now (this is not to say that this cannot change) 3) Delivering canned classes with canned syllabi is a big mistake. Having the right instructor in a classroom setting makes all of the difference sometimes. An instructor's love for what he or she does and the way that the information is delivered and the concepts are explained is much more easily communicated in person than online. Ad hoc references to motivations behind writings in a lit course come to life and breathe understanding into students much more effectively than a canned course could hope to do. The canned course approach reminds me more of a state-run Russian university where free thought is stifled and only the accepted, state-approved observations are passed to the students. We will get canned thinkers who solve problems the same way, if they can solve problems at all. 4) Class separation. This already happens, but it will be much worse. The have's will definitely not be going through an online curriculum. The have-nots will have no choice but to sit at home taking cookie-cutter classes ending in them being rubber-stamped at the end of the process for putting in a little effort. This will result in a working class, very plastic education versus an ivy league education. This will result in a rediculous system that pushes out meaningless degrees on the majority of college students versus traditional meaningful degrees conferred to those who can afford it. This cannot happen, and it must not ever happen.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 7:26:55 AM
All... it is *not* the same degree.  Specifically, a lot of courses are *about* interaction with other human beings.  They need people collected together.  A lot of upper division courses need very close attention from experienced experts in a field to assess.  Also, college is *way* more than just information.  At least 50% of what you learn in college comes from the participation you have in groups and organizations.  The major discipline is just one piece of the puzzle that produces an able and educated participant in society.  I agree, there are a variety of courses that are largely information download that could be handled well and efficiently privately via modern tech.  Certainly that should streamline the college experience.  But, this article is suggesting we're going to throw the baby out with the bathwater.  I hope that ends up not being true.  It's plain scary.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:01:47 AM
iteachrr...I could not disagree more. If anything, online education promotes diversity that would be nearly impossible to replicate in a traditional classroom. Such diversification can and often results in well rounded discussions with greater complexity.

I earned my BS degree online with the University of Phoenix. I regularly worked with students from all over the world. I attended a local college years before earning this degree and I do not recall working with such a diverse group.

To classify online education as canned is myopic to say the least.

Online programs "force" students to be proactive and accountable. This medium also promotes team work and provides an environment where students who may be timid are free to participate regularly.

The author of this story did miss one key aspect. As it stands, many colleges charge more for online education vs a brick & mortar class. I imagine this is a convenience fee in that colleges are fully aware that students will pay more for the convenience of not having to physically attend a class. This provides a greater profit margin for the college and leads to higher student debt. That may change but we'll see.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:08:34 AM
I'm not sure how one can take a chemistry or biology course online however. And I think to take courses for pre meds you might still need land based colleges.
1 - 10 of 231
To add a comment, pleasesign in