Dow+168.61up+1.63%
10,486.77
Nasdaq+41.23up+1.92%
2,187.27
S&P+19.76up+1.81%
1,111.14

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Is a college degree worthless? © Brand X / Getty Images

The Basics

Is a college degree worthless?

The higher incomes that college education brings may not make up for the savings it consumes or the debt it adds early in the life of a typical student.

By Jack Hough, SmartMoney

The four-year college degree has come to cost too much and prove too little. It's now a bad deal for the average student, family, employer, professor and taxpayer.

A student who secures a degree is increasingly unlikely to make up its cost, despite higher pay, as I'll show. The employer who requires a degree puts faith in a system whose standards, you'll see, are slipping. Too many professors who are bound to degree teaching can't truly profess; they don't proclaim loudly the things they know but instead whisper them to a chosen few, whom they must then accommodate with inflated grades. Worst of all, bright citizens spend their lives not knowing the things they ought to know, because they've been granted liberal-arts degrees for something far short of a liberal-arts education.

I'm not arguing against higher learning but for it -- and against the degree system that stands in its way. If that offends, read on, then post a comment at the bottom of this page.

Sometimes things we believe for good reason our whole lives turn out one day to no longer be true, because circumstances have changed. In 2007, for example, I argued, to the anger of many, that renting had come to make more financial sense than homeownership. House prices have since fallen 27% nationwide, wiping out recent buyers who had less than that in equity.

With college degrees, I don't want to persuade families not to buy. I want to explain the injustice of the system and introduce a better alternative.

Degree holders earn more

College grads start out behind

Consider two childhood friends, Ernie and Bill. Hard workers with helpful families, each saves exactly $16,594 for college. Ernie doesn't get accepted to a school he likes. Instead, he starts work at 18 and invests his college savings in a mutual fund that tracks the broad stock market.

Throughout his life, he makes average yearly pay for a high school graduate with no college, starting at $15,901 after taxes and peaking at $32,538. Each month, he adds to his stock fund 5% of his after-tax income, close to the nation's current savings rate. It returns 8% a year, typical for stock investors.

Bill has a typical college experience. He gets into a public college and after two years transfers to a private one. He spends $49,286 on tuition and required fees, the average for such a track. I'm not counting room and board, since Bill must pay for his keep whether he goes to college or not. Bill gets average-size grants, adjusted for average probabilities of receiving them, and so pays $34,044 for college.

He leaves school with an average-size student loan and a good interest rate: $17,450 at 5%. The $16,594 he has saved for college, you see, is precisely enough to pay what his loans don't cover.

The cost of a 4-year college
PublicPrivate
Annual tuition and required fees, 2005-06$5,351$19,292

Growth in tuition and fees beyond inflation, 1995-2005

51%

36%

Median debt upon graduation

$15,500

$19,400

Source: Department of Education, Spellings Commission report

Bill will have higher pay than Ernie his whole life, starting at $23,505 after taxes and peaking at $56,808. Like Ernie, he sets aside 5%. At that rate, it will take him 12 years to pay off his loan. Debt-free at 34, he starts adding to the same index fund as Ernie, making bigger monthly contributions with his higher pay. But when the two reunite at 65 for a retirement party, Ernie will have grown his savings to nearly $1.3 million. Bill will have less than a third of that.

How can that be? College degrees bring higher income, but at today's cost they can't make up the savings they consume and the debt they add early in the life of a typical student. While Ernie was busy earning, Bill got stuck under his bill.

Saving early beats earning more
My example is a crude one. I adjust neither wages nor investment returns for inflation, resulting in something of a wash. I don't take out for investment taxes, since it would take Ernie only a few years to move his starting sum into a tax-shielded retirement account, and both savers could add to such accounts thereafter. I assume 2007's income-tax distribution holds despite pending changes that will shift it in favor of Ernie's lower income. I'm comparing only savings, not living standards. Bill will presumably be able to afford nicer things than Ernie along the way.

But maybe not: I assume that Bill completes college in four years. More than 40% of students who enter a bachelor's program don't have a degree after six years, according to Ohio University economics professor Richard Vedder, whose book "Going Broke by Degree" sounded an alarm over college costs in 2004.

MSN Money multimedia

The College Crunch © MSN Money
The College Crunch
Trying to figure out how to save and pay for college? This MSN Money series, including 'Beat big tuition,' 'Honey, I shrunk the savings' and 'Planning for Harvard,' can help.

Crucially, I also assume college-educated Bill will earn what his peers did in bubbly 2005, when bloated real-estate and stock prices stoked consumer spending, producing unusually large corporate profits and loose lending, and sending banks grabbing after grads at premium pay. The bubbles have since popped, and banks have shrunk.

"The economic downturn has worsened the cost problem," Vedder says. "There will be many more people for whom costs will exceed benefits."

Continued: Degrees are poor proof of learning

 1 | 2 | 3 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

MSN Money Video

Cut College Costs

Cut College costs (c) CorbisLoans, grants, scholarships and aid; budget tips for students.
SmartMoney.com
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 1033
Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:45:55 PM
If the author of this article did go to college I think he's entitled to a refund.
#2
Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:58:24 PM
The author begins with a false premise and consequently the entire article is discredited!  He mistakenly applies the national average savings rate to a segment of our society that does not save anywhere near the average.  Shame on him for not doing his research!
#3
Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:00:08 PM
The author begins with a false premise which discredits his entire article.  He mistakenly applies the average national savings rate to a segment of our society that does not save anywhere near the national average!  Shame on him for not doing the research!
Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:44:21 PM

I have a college degree, and I loved the article.  I first went to an extension campus close to home.  It was more liberal arts based.  Grades were hap hazard, sometimes based upon personal relationships, rounded up from a low D or F to a C because you showed up every day.  I then went to an engineering school.  One sylibas said 89.99999999 is a B.  It was all math based.  I was learning how to think and solve problems, not what to think and how I needed to view the world.  I believe they accepted 90-95% of those who applied.  On orientation they told freshman look to the left of you, look to the right of you, one of them will not be here at graduation.  Prestige should come at diffuculty on the back end, not on the front end.

I also like the comment about exclusion, the school I attended swelled to almost 2X its size when demand called for it.  My pet pieve is nursing schools, dental hygenists etc.  they purposely keep a shortage to keep salaries high. 

Also while his senerios is very flawed, the conclusion is most likely correct.  THe salaries for the HS grads, include many people of less interlectually abilities in the grouping.  Of people I went to HS with that were college material that chose not to go, they are doing as well as most who went.  You should compare salries of 1 standard deviation above the mediun for HS only to college, IMOH. 

Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:15:33 PM

This is so true.   I have 7 brothers and sisters.  4 of us got degrees, 4 didn't.  Those of us who succeeded financially had the most ambition to do so.  Degree or no degree.  The most financially successful one of us (by far) has no degree.  Confidence and ambition is all that's needed.  We do a diservice to our children when we insist they get college degrees. 

Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:21:59 PM

Jack seems to think that everyone attending college is attending Harvard.  Maybe this article should be “Is a Private College Degree Worthless.”  With the majority of students in this nation attending state universities and community colleges, it hardly makes sense to base this discussion on the cost of attending Harvard. Additionally, to make a judgment based solely on savings at time of retirement is ludicrous. Quality of life is an issue that money can buy, and therefore must be included in a discussion of whether or not your child should attend college.  Finally, putting away 5% of your income when you are at a subsistence level is not reasonable.  If this person is smart enough to understand that financial concept at 18 years of age then they probably don’t need college, although they will get where they are going faster if they do.   

 

I think Jack intended to open a discussion about the shortcomings of our universities, but the justification for his argument overshadowed the original point.

Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:40:44 PM
Although 'college education' may be flawed, there is a real need for a 'college degree' in today's world.   I do not have a college degree which has limited my employment options by at least 50%.  Many employers will not consider you unless you have at least a 4 year degree. I have been lucky though out my career to find employment at fine businesses that will substitute experience for education. But a degree, even if taken locally with night classes or via the internet, will increase your marketability and options.
Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:45:21 PM

There is a paradox to the entire learning "tree" that is within America. This paradox states that for a person to gain higher levels of success in life or to achieve certain professions then they MUST go to college. Of course there are some professions that force college degrees and then pay them lower than national averages: Public school teachers. These hard working individuals receive, on average about $10-13 per hour that is put in to the job. This does not include any extra work they might do over the summer months with summer school, tutorials, training that is mandated by almost every state and the like.

Maybe we, as a nation, need to rethink the importance of a college degree. Is it needed? Is it truly propelling us forward? Is it just a money making scheme to take our money like some well dressed snake oil salesman?

Who knows, suffice to say, at this moment, I am getting my Master's Degree. Mainly for the boost in pay I will receive once completed, the addition to my retirement benefits and the knowledge I receive in the class work.

Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:50:03 PM

I possess a Bachelors in chemistry, a Masters in education, and am employed as a public school science teacher; a career that requires a college degree and financially rewards continuing education, and I agree completely with Mr. Hough’s assessment on the state of post-secondary education.

 

At the high school levels I talk-up the grandeur of college because I am supposed to.  I also teach Advanced Placement chemistry and physics, classes designed to be equivalent to college courses.  I really wish they were.  Compared to the local university in my town (think gambling and neon) they are better.

 

Getting a degree from many universities is less about what one has learned to do and more about what one has had the patience to endure (long lines, boring lectures, belligerent roommates, excessive paperwork, obfuscating administration, and cryptic professors with heavy foreign accents).

 

We need a post-secondary system with national standards (or even global standards) that are applied to demonstrations of knowledge and ability, regardless of location, cost, or age of the ivy-covered halls through which the student walked.

Friday, June 19, 2009 12:17:57 AM

At 21 I bought my house. I was making 32,000 a year before taxes. Without a college education.  Living below my means and applying some creative money management means I'll most likely have my house paid off prior to my 33rd birthday. Then there's the stocks, IRA and 401k going now... It can certainly work well for those that try...

 

However, I would like to point out that stupid people will almost always makes less than avg and smart people wil almostl always make more than avg. College can only help the sheep so much...

1 - 10 of 1033
To add a comment, pleasesign in