Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,150.87
S&Punch0.00%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Liz Pulliam Weston

The Basics

4 fixes for the student loan trap

Many of those smiling new grads are about to get a hard lesson: Private lenders have handcuffed them to more debt than they can reasonably repay.

By Liz Pulliam Weston
MSN Money

Carrie's e-mail jumped out at me because she's a fellow mom -- and she's really worried.

Her son borrowed $75,000 in private student loans for college, she wrote. Although he's employed, he can't make the payments the lender is demanding.

"He is a teacher and makes $24,000 a year," Carrie wrote. "(The lender wants) a payment of $1,400 a month. He brings home barely that (much)."

If these were federal student loans, Carrie's son would have a number of good options. The best, starting July 1, would be the new income-based repayment plans that allow borrowers to cap their monthly payments at 15% of their discretionary income.

Because he's a teacher, any unpaid balance would have been forgiven after 10 years. Those who don't work in public-service jobs can have their balances forgiven after 25 years of repayment.

But his are not federal loans. Unfortunately, Carrie's son -- and thousands of young people like him -- have tumbled into a trap set by private lenders.

Here's the problem

Barely old enough to vote, these borrowers have signed up for high-rate debt they often can't afford, can't refinance and can't escape.

I've covered this situation before -- including in "How did student loans get so sleazy?" -- but here's a recap for those who don't know the stark differences between federal and private student loans:

  • Federal student loan rates are fixed at a maximum 6.8%. Private loans, by contrast, usually come with variable rates that have no caps. Private loans currently average 11% to 12%, said student loan expert Mark Kantrowitz of FinAid. Those rates could increase sharply as the economy recovers and general interest rates rise.

  • What's more, applicants often aren't told the interest rates they'll get until they sign the promissory notes agreeing to pay back their loans. The rates are often based on the borrowers' credit scores, but shopping for the best deal is tough because most lenders don't disclose their rates in advance.

  • Federal student loans come with numerous consumer protections and flexible options for repayment, including graduated payments, income-sensitive plans and consolidation, which stretch out the repayment period to lower the payments. Private loans often lack these options. Refinancing or consolidating has become impossible for many borrowers as fewer lenders offer these options and those that do demand high credit scores.

Video on MSN Money

Students buried by debts © CNBC
Students buried by debts
The skyrocketing cost of college is pushing students further and further into the hole.

Students often turn to private loans after exhausting their federal student loan options. That's happening more often these days because the maximum undergraduates can borrow through federal loan programs hasn't changed since 1992.

But some students never apply for federal loans. Some are steered by their colleges straight to private lenders, while others don't realize they qualify for federal programs. These students don't know that anyone who fills out a Free Application for Federal Student Aid can qualify for federal student loans, regardless of need.

Continued: Let's fix the problem

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 126
Monday, June 01, 2009 5:38:52 AM
student loans cost too much
Monday, June 01, 2009 5:48:17 AM
I'm also struggling to pay off $52,000 in student loans.  I can't seem to hit the principal.  They raised the daily interest accrual on me and I can't get an answer why.  I'm with Nelnet and they suck.
Monday, June 01, 2009 6:23:27 AM
I have often thought that the double-the-rate-of-inflation costs of higher education were a RESULT of the easy access to credit. I wish someone with expertise would look into this! And I think colleges are complicitous to some extent, as the scandal last year on gifts/kickbacks to college loan officers suggested.

Thanks for pointing to the myth of "good debt."

Monday, June 01, 2009 7:00:21 AM

People should be choosing vocational schools not college.  There are huge shortages of workers with vocational skills, absolutely astonishing shortages.  Instead, kids are brainwashed into thinking college is great when our own Commerce department recently issued a report that says 69% of all jobs require no college at all.  Any desk job can be outsourced overseas.  Not true with vocational work.  Sadly, most reporters are college educated so they cannot think outside of the box and keep writing these ridiculous untrue stories about how great college is for your future.  Total nonsense.

Monday, June 01, 2009 7:13:09 AM

frugalscholar,

I have always believed the same thing, just like easy credit pushed housing prices higher, it will also push college tuition higher.  Student Loans are not the problem in this case.  Borrowing 75K for a job where you are making 22k is bad even if the interest rate was 3.5%.  Her son needs a second job, or should have worked through school, or gone the public route.   

Throwing more money at it will just make costs keep going up.  I also would like to see a study. 

Monday, June 01, 2009 7:18:23 AM

My daughter signed for private loans and she is swiming in debt over $100k now.  How can we get to the congress people to hear that bankrupcy courts should include private -not government student loans- in bankrupcy?  those private money companies have taken advance of naive students.

Monday, June 01, 2009 7:23:33 AM

Pretty one-sided and pejorative article. All private student loan lenders are evil, wanting nothing more than to gouge and profit from the stupid and the weak. If I may offer an informed and alternative perspective, many of them truly care about the social value of supporting and enabling post-secondary education for those who weren't born with a silver spoon or an IQ garnering full scholarships. Many of them are aware of the plight of debt burdened students and anguish over solutions that make it possible to continue to loan money for a social cause and accept tolerable repayment terms from debtors. A profit is necessary to keep investors who own and enable private lenders happy. How to earn a decent profit, in investors' eyes, and enable repayment by debt-burdened lowly paid college grads is not an easy thing. If your so smart and so caring, provide help in this direction. Because your other solutions, once federal aid is exhausted, are unworkable in today's economy and political arena.

Monday, June 01, 2009 8:44:19 AM
What ever happened to personal responsibility.. Sometime I think that we are responsible for everone's actions except our own.
Monday, June 01, 2009 9:02:55 AM

I personally find it repulsive that the government has spent so much on bailing out banks and greedy homeowners and could care less about students.  While the government has taken baby steps on helping the situation, the help has always been for undergraduate students.  The country encourages you to continue your education but could care less if you can afford to do so.  My undergraduate loan rates were at 3.5%--at least this payment can be managed.  How is that the rate for graduate student loans (6.8%) exceeds the rate for homes (4.75%)?!

Monday, June 01, 2009 9:03:36 AM
I don't doubt the recent graduate featured in the story has $75,000 in student loan debt - why this is private loan debt, I don't understand. Every school I've attended process student loan awards using Federal Staffords first, then give students the option to make up the gap between max Staffords and the annual cost of attendance with private loans.  Once a student goes to grad school, much more federal funding is available beyond the Staffords - the Grad Plus loan for students.  I think this type of "extra" loan should also be an option for undergrad students (bachelors degree level), especially for those that attend schools with higher tuition.

The next thing I wanted to say is that making only $24,000 as a teacher seems a little low. I'm not sure what part of the country this teacher is in, but here in Southern California, step one teachers start out about $40,000 per year.  Most students with a teaching credentail also got the Masters in Education degree that is attached to the teaching credential program - therefore, we start out around $55,000 year with a masters degree.  Since teaching is a career that requires a lot of education (at least a bachelors degree, and then at least a fifth year credential program), I don't doubt this graduate's student loan debt load is that high.  Even at public schools, 5+ years of education at $15,000 yr. is actually pretty low, especially after one adds in room, board, books and living expenses.

One poster said that this graduate should have worked during college.  That is always better than taking on huge debt loads if at all possible, but it's not always possible with some majors.  Teaching majors have to do student teaching as part of their major, and we don't get paid for that.  We have to teach all day long during regular school hours, just like a normal teacher does. Then, in the evenings, we have our classroom portion where we are going over the day's teaching. learning how to write lesson plans and curriculum, etc.  There is no time to work when you're in a program like this.  The same can be said for many other majors that have a significant hands-on segment like nursing or physical therapy.

So what I'm trying to say is it is not uncommon to have this type of student loan debt upon graduation, especially for some majors. But definitely something needs to be done to give undergrads more options, and I agree that the federal loan limits have to be raised to keep pace with modern college tuition and expenses. I am happy to see some of the new programs that set payments based on a percentage of one's income (15%) and forgiveness after 10 years of payments.... private loans should be subject to the same provisions.  If they cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, then they should have to play by the same rules that the federal ones do.

I had one small private loan that I took during one semester - after I learned how these had a whole different set of conditions than my federal loans did, and I could not consolidate my private loans with my feds, I used a portion of my grad plus loans and repaid the private one immediately. Got rid of it.



1 - 10 of 126
To add a comment, pleasesign in