Get stock info

ticker symbol 1current listingchangeticker symbol 2current listingchangeticker symbol 3current listingchange
Dow12,992.6694.28Nasdaq2,533.7337.03S&P1,423.5714.91
income inequality © Image Source / SuperStock

Extra4/9/2008 6:46 PM ET

Gap between rich, poor Americans accelerates

A stagnating middle class is stuck between a lower class with shrinking incomes and an upper class with an expanding slice of the pie, a new study finds.  

By Reuters

The gap between rich and poor in many U.S. states has broadened at a quickening pace since the last recession, which could make it difficult for low-income families to weather the current economic downturn, according to a report issued today.

Since the late 1990s, average incomes have declined 2.5% for families on the bottom fifth of the country's economic ladder, while incomes have increased 9.1% for families on the top fifth, said the report from the liberal-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute.

The result is that the average incomes of the top 5% of families are 12 times the average incomes of the bottom 20%.

"The report's bottom line is that since the late 1980s, income gaps widened in 37 states and have not narrowed in any states," said Jared Bernstein, one of the report's authors. "In fact, we've found that the trend toward growing inequality has accelerated during this decade."

Meanwhile, the middle class has remained virtually stagnant, with average incomes growing just 1.3% in nearly eight years, the report said.

The report drew from U.S. Census Bureau data collected from 1987 through 2006 and is one of the few to record income inequality on a state-by-state basis. It did not include capital gains and losses in its calculations.

The technology boom and economic expansion of the late 1990s put many lower-income families in better positions at the start of the 2001 economic downturn than they are in now, when many economists say a downturn has begun, Bernstein said.

Elizabeth McNichol, another author of the report, said wages grew before the 2001 recession but have not increased much during the past several years of recovery. In a conference call with reporters, she pointed to Connecticut, which has had the greatest increase in income inequality since the 1980s, according to the report.

In Connecticut, incomes of the wealthiest 20% are eight times those of the poorest 20%, the report said. New York has the greatest disparity, with incomes of the top 20% 8.7 times the bottom ones, followed by Alabama, where the top are 8.5 times the bottom.

Only recently has Connecticut begun recovering from the downturn of six years ago, according to Douglas Hall, the associate director of research for Connecticut Voices for Children, who participated in the call. By August 2007 the state had gained enough jobs to make up for those lost in the last recession, he said, but now it is losing them again.

Even though the study did not include capital gains, Bernstein said the effects of booming wealth on Wall Street for most of this decade did contribute to the spread between incomes, showing up as higher salaries.

Some have criticized income inequality studies. Writing for the conservative Cato Institute last year, Alan Reynolds said tax-law changes skew the numbers. For example, executives once took stock options that were taxed as capital gains but now take nonqualified stock options that are taxed as salaries.

Bernstein said that if the report had considered capital gains, the disparities would have likely been greater, as capital gains generally affect higher-income people.

State-by-state comparison:

 
StateRankBottom 5thTop 5thRatioStateRankBottom 5thTop 5thRatio  

New York

1

$17,107

$148,192

8.7

Washington

27

$19,545

$134,090

6.9

Alabama

2

$13,280

$112,804

8.5

Kansas

28

$18,807

$127,963

6.8

Mississippi

3

$14,205

$117,454

8.3

South Carolina

29

$15,932

$107,378

6.7

Massachusetts

4

$20,609

$168,991

8.2

Indiana

30

$17,635

$118,078

6.7

Tennessee

5

$14,129

$114,396

8.1

Georgia

31

$17,188

$115,071

6.7

New Mexico

6

$14,798

$118,608

8

Arkansas

32

$15,628

$100,280

6.4

Connecticut

7

$21,133

$169,378

8

Maine

33

$18,302

$115,720

6.3

California

8

$18,312

$145,358

7.9

South Dakota

34

$18,025

$113,623

6.3

Texas

9

$16,088

$126,658

7.9

Nevada

35

$19,730

$123,815

6.3

Kentucky

10

$14,318

$110,353

7.7

North Dakota

36

$19,188

$119,804

6.2

Virginia

11

$20,401

$154,259

7.6

Ohio

37

$18,337

$114,353

6.2

Rhode Island

12

$18,974

$143,211

7.5

Alaska

38

$21,086

$130,740

6.2

Illinois

13

$18,340

$138,011

7.5

Iowa

39

$18,817

$115,187

6.1

New Jersey

14

$23,260

$175,011

7.5

Wisconsin

40

$20,073

$120,440

6

Florida

15

$17,436

$130,840

7.5

Minnesota

41

$23,343

$139,989

6

West Virginia

16

$13,941

$103,911

7.5

Vermont

42

$21,168

$126,504

6

Oklahoma

17

$16,909

$123,596

7.3

Wyoming

43

$18,296

$108,553

5.9

Louisiana

18

$15,555

$113,499

7.3

Nebraska

44

$19,919

$116,171

5.8

Maryland

19

$21,952

$159,456

7.3

Hawaii

45

$23,328

$135,525

5.8

Arizona

20

$16,744

$121,116

7.2

Montana

46

$16,439

$94,444

5.7

North Carolina

21

$16,436

$118,259

7.2

Delaware

47

$20,367

$116,110

5.7

Missouri

22

$17,722

$126,619

7.1

Idaho

48

$19,708

$110,274

5.6

Michigan

23

$17,934

$126,264

7

New Hampshire

49

$24,175

$134,867

5.6

Colorado

24

$20,341

$142,181

7

Utah

50

$21,721

$117,662

5.4

Pennsylvania

25

$18,960

$130,968

6.9

District of Columbia

$14,011

$188,541

13.5

Oregon

26

$18,515

$127,248

6.9

Total U.S.

$18,116

$132,131

7.3

Rate this Article

Click on the stars below to rate this article from 1 to 5 LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Advertisement

Advertisement

Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2005. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.