Dow+17.46up+0.17%
10,023.42
Nasdaq+7.12up+0.34%
2,112.44
S&P+2.67up+0.25%
1,069.30

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money . . .
Credit © Mike Kemp/Getty Images

The Basics

Under 21? No credit card for you

A new law bans plastic for those under 21 unless they have enough income or get someone to co-sign. There's no agreement on how much good the legislation will do, though.

By U.S. News & World Report

At age 18, Americans become eligible to vote, enter the military, serve on a jury and marry without parental consent, in most states. But starting in February 2010, there will be one less opportunity with that milestone: getting a credit card.

On May 22, President Barack Obama signed into law the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009. The bill restricts credit card issuers from raising interest rates without warning, penalizing customers who pay on time and levying excessive fees.

There's also a provision that specifically concerns young people: Under the new law, no one under age 21 can get a credit card unless a parent, guardian or spouse is willing to co-sign or unless the young adult has proof of sufficient income to cover the credit obligations.

Speaking on the Senate floor in May, Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., said the bill aims to prevent credit card companies from "targeting college kids to weigh them down with debt before they even graduate."

In April, student loan corporation Sallie Mae released a national study that examines the use of credit by undergraduates. The study found that in 2004, 76% of undergrads had at least one credit card. Today, 84% do. The average amount students say they charged to their credit cards to pay for education expenses (such as school supplies) has increased from $942 in 2004 to $2,200 currently. What's more, 82% of undergrads with cards report that they do not pay off their full balances every month, and the median debt among this group is $1,645, compared with $946 in 2004.

A solution or just different problems?

Not surprisingly, there has been plenty of debate over whether or not the bill's provisions will actually help young Americans. Here are some of the thorny issues raised by the new law:

Layer of protection? One of the most contentious issues is the role of the co-signer. In the eyes of the bill's supporters, the requirement that a parent must co-sign is exactly the kind of help young Americans need to start making better financial choices.

"What I like (about the bill) is that it will protect the uneducated -- the naive who have not been exposed to the basics of good use of credit," says Mary Ann Campbell, a certified financial planner who teaches a consumer finance course at the University of Central Arkansas.

Campbell points out that credit card companies will issue cards only to those with parents or guardians with good credit histories, so there will be an additional layer of authority to make sure inexperience does not lead to massive debt for young adults who have a parent or guardian co-sign.

Other experts aren't so sure that the bill will really encourage more responsibility. "There's no evidence that someone manages credit cards better at 21 than 18," says John Ulzheimer, the president of consumer education for Credit.com.

Others say adding that extra layer of protection can only help, given the high level of student debt in the country. "I'm not sure that it solves the problem, but at least it puts an adult in the loop," says Dan Danford, the chief executive of the Family Investment Center in St. Louis.

The bottom line: Even if they are financially savvy, younger Americans will have to wait until their 21st birthdays to get a credit card unless they have a parent willing to co-sign or they make sufficient income to meet the requirements.

Continued: The drawbacks to waiting

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 335
Friday, June 12, 2009 5:23:52 AM
I feel that having a credit card under 21 is important.  Especially for emergencies.  It got me out of a bind a few times when I was that age.  I did carry a balance once for about 3 months in college but needed to do so to finish a summer semester to graduate.  I've never carried a balance since and have a very good credit score.  I think it helped me learn to keep better accountability for my finances.
Friday, June 12, 2009 5:46:18 AM

Well if you leave it up to the banks to define what is enough income...well then that bill was a complete waste of time and money.

The bank will continue what they have been doing for oh about 50 years which is keep both the american government and its citizen in debt FOREVER. People of this country really NEED to wake up and realize what is going on in this country of ours. Do your research on The Federal Reserve, what there about, how and why they were formed and by whom, an most importantly WHO controls them...you will be shocked to find out the TRUTH about them, this country and where we are headed. Google it and take a visit to you tube.

Friday, June 12, 2009 5:56:05 AM
Having credit under 21 is extremely important. Without it I would not have had the credit history necessary to purchase a car at 19 or a house at 22. I always had a job though with more than enough income to support my credit lines so this would never have applied to me nor any other person that has the means to support a credit line.

The only thing this bill does in my eyes is prevent credit card companies from giving credit to jobless college students. Why should college students get a special exemption allowing them to have easy credit without any proof of income? Every credit application I've filled out always required income listed and I was under the impression that played heavily into how much I was approved for.

Friday, June 12, 2009 6:21:37 AM
Based upon what we've seen in the past year, I'm not entirely convinced that the parents are any more financially responsible than the kids.

Maybe instead of this, we need some kind of "graduated credit licensing" like we have for drivers' licenses.  At 18, you could get a $500 credit line.  If you handle it OK, it would increase to $1,000 at 19, $2,000 at 20, and $4,000 at 21.

This would at least keep young people from getting *too* deeply in debt at too young an age.

As an aside, my son's (he is 19) auto insurance just went up by ~$100 every 6 months because he didn't have a credit rating.  So his reward for being responsible and not signing up for a credit card at college enrollment, and not going into debt, was to get screwed by American Family Insurance.  

Friday, June 12, 2009 6:45:07 AM

Establishing credit is such an important thing and there are plenty of young people who DON'T abuse credit cards.  The problem of "sufficent income" is that everyone should have to prove they have the means to repay their debt, not just young people.  The article indicates many students are charging educational expenses--which is another issue entirely.

Friday, June 12, 2009 6:53:03 AM
Believe it or not, this is actually a provision asked for by the CC companies. First off, the 18 - 21 year old must prove they can repay the card. For some strange reason, I think that a 30 year old should have to prove the same thing to get a card, in fact, I thought the CC companies should have already have been doing this step for everyone. Second, now they will need a co-signer. This is what the companies wanted, someone they can go after for letting them rack up too much debt. Lets say I co-sign for my 18 year old on a card for a $1000 to help them buy supplies, some gas money when needed, and other necessities as they go to college. After a few months, the CC company will increase the limit to maybe 2000, then a few later up to 3000. You as a parent will not even know about these limit increases, Then when you finally find out that they have racked up 5000 in debt and you call the CC company, they will say they cannot talk to you because you are not the primary card holder. By the time you straighten this out, you are on the hook for 5000, or your credit will be ruined. If you must do this, when you co-sign, write next to your name that this signature is only valid for up to 1000, then initial next to it. Keep a copy of the original application or have a bank employee initial it also. The other option is to open up a card in your name for a 1000 and have them get a card as an authorized user. This way you get the bill and can keep tabs on what they are doing.
Friday, June 12, 2009 7:02:12 AM
More Laws.  We are slowly losing our freedom.  There should be a law not to eat fast food because that willl clog your atteries.  There should be a law not to go out in the sun because of skin cancer.  It's slowly comming.  People need to wake up!!!!
Friday, June 12, 2009 7:07:58 AM

As someone whom this law actually effects I'm insulted by the way that my age group gets treated. I appreciate the fact that they are trying to 'protect' us, however, we are ADULTS. Its insulting to be babied by legislation, just because we aren't fully mature yet doesn't give anyone the right to take away things from us. How do become mature? You go through difficult situations and learn to become more responsible. How is this going to happen if we are continuously coddled?

Friday, June 12, 2009 7:16:51 AM
Then why did my 2 year old get a prescreened application in the mail for a credit card the other day!  I have a custodial account with him at this particular, but apparently they don't include the DOB in the prescreening process in selecting who the bank will extend credit to!!!
Friday, June 12, 2009 7:27:06 AM
Let me say one thing.  The credit card companies *#&#&$ are a bunch of hypocrites.  I was taking a class at PC several years back, and there was a Mastercard rep in the main lobby basically "****-ing" his credit card to students, telling them to "just put 1,000 a month" in the income section, even though they CLEARLY WERE NOT MAKING $1,000 a month.  So these kids get their cards, with $1K-$3K limits, whack them out partying and drinking and eating and buying clothes, etc, and now make up a large percentage of adults under 30 that have absolutely terrible credit.  So now we need legislation, and we're "establishing martial law" and not offering cards to ANYONE under 21, blah blah blah.  How about just giving credit to those customers that can rightfully afford it?  Simple huh?
1 - 10 of 335
To add a comment, pleasesign in