Credit card fine print may hide traps © Jupiterimages

The Basics

The traps in credit cards' fine print

Reading credit card agreements can give you a headache. The text is often dense, in terms of both appearance and language, but you ignore it at your own risk.

By SmartMoney

The length and readability of credit card agreements, in which issuers disclose their fees, penalties and rewards restrictions, have long been the subject of criticism by consumer advocates. Some are printed in fonts small enough for newspapers to consider off-limits. Others have the type squeezed together so tightly that the low-hanging letters of one line bleed into the one beneath it. The complexity of the language, albeit more subjective, has also drawn plenty of fire.

Two recent studies shed some light on the dangers of putting such critical information in such densely packed documents. Together they suggest consumers could miss key points when skipping ahead to the signature lines, but that the act of reading and understanding such a document in its entirety is beyond the ability of the average applicant.

In a study of online card applications from the 10 largest issuers, card comparison site Card Hub found that many applications buried important information about balance transfer fees and the redemption value of rewards points deep in text-heavy paragraphs where it could easily be missed.

A distracted or skimming reader could easily miss such information, says Odysseas Papadimitriou, the chief executive of Card Hub.

A separate study suggests even a thorough reading of a credit card agreement is no guarantee of understanding it. The average credit card agreement is written on a 12th-grade reading level, three grades above the average American's reading level, according to the study by CreditCards.com. The findings suggest four out of five adults wouldn't be able to understand the documents if they tried.

A spokesman for the American Bankers Association says disclosures have been substantially improved as a result of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, with key points about interest rates and fees summarized in two tables included in all solicitations, card agreements and monthly statements. Now, "your ability to understand what your credit is going to cost you is much better than it was a year ago," since that disclosure requirement recently took effect, the spokesman says.

Of course, the legal onus is on the consumer to read any credit card offer thoroughly and carefully before applying for a card, and industry analysts and lawyers say there's no shortcut for combing through these materials.

A confused customer should call the issuer and ask for an explanation of any unclear points, the association spokesman says.

When evaluating a credit card offer for themselves, consumers can start with a basic common-sense test: If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

"If you see some very attractive-sounding teaser deal, just know for sure there's a trap somewhere," says Tim Chen, the CEO of NerdWallet, a credit card comparison site.

Continued: 5 more tips

More from MSN Money and SmartMoney

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh
SmartMoney.com
6Comments
10/21/2010 2:54 PM
avatar

I have to say, I read all of the credit card offers I get as well as all correspondence from my current card issuers, and while there is indeed fine print, basic information about the important terms (the interest rate, the promotional period for intro rates, the balance transfer fees, the penalties for a late payment and when they'll be assessed) is in plain English and not buried in the small print.  Frankly, anyone incapable of reading and understanding it shouldn't use a credit card.

 

I do, however, side with consumers on the issue of unclear offers - 0% for "up to" 18 months, a regular interest rate "as low as" 9.99%, etc.  IMHO, it's bait and switch.  If you don't qualify for the offer that you apply for, the bank should simply deny your application rather than open an account with inferior terms that you may not want. 

 

Can you imagine if the rest of businesses operated this way?  It would be like pulling up to the gas pump and selecting the button for premium, only to be told "we only have regular unleaded.  But you still have to fill your car with it and you still have to pay the premium price...you can't just not buy gas here today."

10/21/2010 12:22 PM
avatar

If you do not have the self control to pay your monthly cc bill off in full each month on a timely basis, cash (or a debit card) is the best choice over racking up interest, late charges, etc.  But for those who live beneath their means, selective credit cards actually do have real value in the rewards area.  We charge alot, pay them off in full each month and probably amass close to $1k a year in cash back not counting a fair number of air miles which we do use, despite the airlines trying their best to limit their use.

10/21/2010 10:52 AM
avatar

Rather a radical thought, but I haven't had a CC in over 3 years and I still fly, rent cars, hotels, etc. and have not been hampered in any way. When I am done with my trip, vacation, or whatever, it is paid for. I may not get reward advantages, but I am not paying 18% for them either.

 

Thank you Dave Ramsey!

 

10/21/2010 8:45 AM
avatar
The system was designed to make sure the consumer has no legal recourse, it would be un-American to allow the commoner to use the wealthiest legal system against them.
10/21/2010 8:35 AM
avatar
Zuma:  The consumer always has the last word.  This is still a free economy and there are alternatives to dishonist financial institutions.  I do not deal with institutions that have previously broken promises or provided others with access to my idenity.  The list my be long but the list of available institutions is longer.  20 years ago Discover (Sears) posted false information about me.  They have lost several thousands of dolars of business from me every year since then.  Obviously, I was not the only one who felt this way since both the credit agency (which has been sold) and the store are a piddling immage of what they once were.  Economists give various reasons for the decline but the lack of consumer confidence is always overlooked.  Watch Chase as they struggle to overcome a history of malpractice and ineptitude.  It's kind of funny to see them struggle.
10/21/2010 3:27 AM
avatar

Unfortunately, our courts have ruled that banks dont have to abide by the federally mandated disclosure and judges can change or remove any disclosure of terms made.

 

The judges are given immunity from the laws and Constitution as are the states, so the damaged cardholder is completely without recourse for the banks failure to abide b y what was disclosed. 

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of ConductPlease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
Additional comments(optional)
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
viewCounter