How long until housing recovers its losses?
A long time, if history is any guide. The Federal Housing Finance Agency last week released a study of real-estate downturns since 1975, tracking home prices from the quarter in which the declines began to the quarter in which inflation-adjusted prices returned to their previous highs.
Prices typically fell for three years and nine months, the agency said, but the average recovery took nearly twice that long: six years and eight months.
If that sounds depressing, consider the length of recovery times in the four regional housing busts the paper studied. On average, home prices in Texas are still 15% below their inflation-adjusted peak -- reached in 1982.
- Talk back: When will home prices recover?
The study, using regional and metro housing data going back four decades, went on to examine four busts in greater detail. The authors, however, cautioned that comparisons between historical regional busts and the current national one are limited; each of those studied was provoked by a sharp drop in employment, while the current bust was triggered by careless lending and borrowing practices.
Below the charts are summaries of each bust from the agency's report.
The New England bust:
| Metro area | Peak | Bottom | Depreciation | Full recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hartford, Conn. | 1988 Q2 | 1997 Q2 | 40.7% | |
New Haven-Milford, Conn. | 1988 Q2 | 1997 Q2 | 40.6% | 2005 Q2 |
Manchester-Nashua, N.H. | 1988 Q2 | 1995 Q1 | 39.2% | 2002 Q4 |
Kingston, N.Y. | 1988 Q2 | 1996 Q4 | 39.1% | 2003 Q3 |
Rockingham County-Strafford County, N.H. | 1987 Q4 | 1994 Q4 | 38.0% | 2002 Q2 |
Binghamton, N.Y. | 1988 Q1 | 1997 Q1 | 37.7% | |
Barnstable Town, Mass. | 1988 Q1 | 1994 Q4 | 36.5% | 2001 Q2 |
Norwich-New London, Conn. | 1988 Q4 | 1996 Q3 | 36.2% | 2004 Q2 |
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Conn. | 1987 Q3 | 1996 Q4 | 34.4% | 2003 Q3 |
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, N.Y. | 1988 Q1 | 1997 Q3 | 33.9% | 2003 Q1 |
Worcester, Mass. | 1988 Q2 | 1995 Q1 | 32.9% | 2002 Q1 |
Springfield, Mass. | 1988 Q4 | 1996 Q3 | 32.5% | 2004 Q2 |
The New England economy began to weaken in 1988. In prior years, unemployment in the region had fallen to 3%, and per capita income had climbed to 123% of the national average. However, a more competitive computer industry, the end of the Cold War (and a resulting decline in defense contracts) and elevated business costs eventually resulted in high unemployment and high commercial and residential vacancy rates.
Real-estate prices reached a sharp peak in the second quarter of 1988 and fell dramatically after that, ultimately dropping more than 32%. Prices bottomed out in the first quarter of 1997, at which point a relatively speedy recovery ensued. Ultimately, the New England housing cycle included a nearly nine-year period of decline followed by a brief recovery of just under five years to its previous peak.
The California bust:
| Metro area | Peak | Bottom | Depreciation | Full recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, Calif. | 1989 Q4 | 1997 Q2 | 36.7% | 2003 Q2 |
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Calif. | 1989 Q3 | 1997 Q1 | 35.3% | 2002 Q3 |
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. | 1990 Q1 | 1997 Q2 | 33.9% | 2002 Q4 |
Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, Calif. | 1989 Q4 | 1997 Q1 | 33.6% | 2002 Q1 |
The California economy expanded rapidly in the 1980s. Gross state product grew at an annual rate of 5.1% from 1983 to 1989, well above the national growth rate of 3.6%. The state's economic growth was accompanied by substantial population growth, which led to a construction boom and large increases in real-estate prices.
By 1989, a substantial decline in national defense spending seriously hurt California's booming defense industry. In addition, the national recession of 1990-91 reduced the demand for goods and services produced in California. Unemployment increased, and the California real-estate market subsequently collapsed.
As in New England, California's downturn in the early 1990s had a relatively speedy recovery of less than five years to its previous peak.In the early 2000s, California experienced a particularly large home price boom fueled by a marked increase in the availability of mortgage credit. Home prices in California peaked in the first quarter of 2006. The ensuing subprime-mortgage crisis has hit California particularly hard. As of the first quarter of 2009, home prices have fallen almost 44%, adjusted for inflation, far more than the 32% drop from 1989 to 1997.
The energy bust:
| Metro area | Peak | Bottom | Depreciation | Full recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Midland, Texas | 1982 Q2 | 2000 Q4 | 56.2% | |
Lafayette, La. | 1982 Q3 | 1988 Q4 | 52.5% | |
Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, Wash. | 1979 Q3 | 1988 Q4 | 44.5% | |
Oklahoma City | 1980 Q1 | 1990 Q4 | 42.6% | |
San Antonio | 1981 Q4 | 1990 Q4 | 41.4% | |
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, Texas | 1979 Q2 | 1997 Q1 | 40.8% | |
Austin-Round Rock, Texas | 1986 Q2 | 1990 Q4 | 39.9% | 2006 Q3 |
New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, La. | 1979 Q2 | 1991 Q1 | 39.3% | 2005 Q4 |
Baton Rouge, La. | 1979 Q2 | 1990 Q4 | 39.0% | |
Beaumont-Port Arthur, Texas | 1979 Q1 | 1990 Q4 | 37.6% | |
Salem, Ore. | 1979 Q1 | 1987 Q4 | 37.3% | 1997 Q2 |
Tulsa, Okla. | 1980 Q3 | 1990 Q4 | 37.1% | |
Corpus Christi, Texas | 1982 Q1 | 1990 Q4 | 36.2% | |
Shreveport-Bossier City, La. | 1984 Q2 | 1991 Q3 | 34.0% | |
Ogden-Clearfield, Utah | 1979 Q1 | 1990 Q4 | 33.9% | 1997 Q2 |
Dallas-Plano-Irving, Texas | 1986 Q2 | 1995 Q1 | 33.8% |
Although the oil crises of the 1970s put a drag on the national economy, they boosted the economy and home prices in Texas. During the period, nonresidential construction in Texas more than quadrupled, and office vacancy rates fell from 15% to 7.6% in Dallas and from 7.8% to 5.7% in Houston.
By 1982, however, oil prices had begun to fall, and, with each $1 drop in the price of crude resulting in an estimated loss of 25,000 jobs in Texas, declining oil prices had significantly hurt that state's economy. Coupled with a weakening national economy, the oil price declines led to significant drops in employment. The layoffs began in the oil fields but were followed by job losses in related fields (geologists and engineers) and next in service businesses (motels, restaurants and retail stores). By September 1986, 743,000 Texans were unemployed.
Home prices peaked in the first quarter of 1982 and then declined steadily. Prices bottomed out in the first quarter of 1997 after a drop of 33%. Statewide, Texas real-estate prices have yet to fully recover; they now are roughly 15% below their prior peak.The Midwest bust:
| Metro area | Peak | Bottom | Depreciation | Full recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Peoria, Ill. | 1979 Q4 | 1985 Q4 | 48.9% | |
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, Iowa-Ill. | 1978 Q4 | 1989 Q2 | 47.2% | |
Topeka, Kan. | 1978 Q4 | 1993 Q1 | 36.4% | |
Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, Mich. | 1979 Q3 | 1984 Q4 | 34.6% | 1996 Q4 |
Evansville, Ind.-Ky. | 1980 Q3 | 1991 Q3 | 34.4% | |
Toledo, Ohio | 1979 Q1 | 1985 Q4 | 33.6% | |
Ann Arbor, Mich. | 1978 Q4 | 1985 Q1 | 33.2% | 1997 Q3 |
Wichita, Kan. | 1979 Q2 | 1992 Q4 | 33.1% |
Michigan and Detroit mirror Texas with respect to home price downturns. What drove Texas' expansion in the 1970s and early 1980s caused the collapse of Detroit's economy, and what caused the collapse of the Texas economy caused Detroit's rebirth. As a result of the challenges facing the American auto industry after the oil crises of the 1970s and the subsequent emergence of fuel-efficient, foreign-made automobiles, Detroit experienced significant unemployment, and the local housing market collapsed.
Real-estate prices peaked in the third quarter of 1979 and fell precipitously until the fourth quarter of 1984, when the oil bust spurred demand for gas-gulping, U.S.-made automobiles. Detroit's home prices returned to their 1979 peak in 1996, more than 17 years later. They have since plummeted in the current downturn.
Rate this Article





Death of the mortgage broker