Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Home financing © Corbis

Extra11/11/2009 8:05 PM ET

When will your housing market recover?

There are lots of reports about national trends in home sales and prices, but none may apply where you live. Here's how to dig up your local data.

By Bankrate.com

Pundits love to make predictions as to when U.S. home prices will stabilize. But even well-respected forecasters and analysts may disagree, and even if a forecast proves true nationally, your local market may behave in a wildly different way.

This disconnect between broad-stroke forecasts and small local markets presents quite a puzzle for homebuyers and home sellers, who need to make major financial decisions on the basis of facts, not fiction. If you want or need to sell your home, how do you know the best time to put it on the market?

The national housing market is more than large enough to encompass a wide variety of trends in different places and on different timelines. And that means, at the end of the day, you'll need to rely on your own best judgment to make decisions for yourself and your family.

Local numbers are more meaningful

So how can you figure out when home prices and sales hit bottom and begin to recover in your neighborhood? You may need to do your own research to find the answer. Dig up facts and figures about your own city or town and combine that data with information about national trends to formulate your own conclusions.

Plenty of data are as close as your keyboard, though the process of sifting through the figures may take quite a lot of time and thoughtful analysis. If you're tempted to skip out on what may seem a burdensome homework assignment and instead rely on your own gut instincts, you might want to take a tip from Stuart Gabriel, director of UCLA's Ziman Center for Real Estate in Los Angeles. He says, "Some investors are very instinctual, and this has worked out well for them, but most of us rely on the acquisition of information."

Get your data straight from the original source

For starters, here's an overview of some of the data and the organizations and agencies that collect and disseminate it:

Supply of for-sale homes a key indicator

If you don't want to indulge in that much research, zero in on the most important statistic, which, Gabriel suggests, is the supply, or inventory, of homes that are for sale in your local area.

"There is a whole litany (of factors that affect housing) -- home sales, housing starts, building permits, house prices -- and all of those are important indicators," he says, "but the inventory numbers in particular are really important."

The inventory of for-sale homes in a local area is usually measured as the number of months' supply at the current pace of sales.

More months of supply indicate a weaker housing market. Many months suggests plenty of homes are for sale or the pace of sales is slow. Those conditions are indicative of a market that favors buyers. Few months suggests a limited number of homes for sale or the pace of sales is fast. Those factors are indicative of a market that favors sellers.

Many local Realtor associations and multiple listing services, or MLSs, collect and publish this type of information. Ideally, the data should be segmented by locale, type of home and price range, though that degree of specificity is rarely on offer.

Housing starts increase supply of for-sale homes

Two other important housing-market indicators are residential building permits and home construction starts, according to Gabriel. Bernard Markstein, senior economist at the National Association of Home Builders in Washington, D.C., agrees. These indicators are measured by local government building officials and the U.S. Census Bureau. A spike in permits or starts may indicate more optimism among homebuilders but can also suggest a dramatic rise in the supply of for-sale homes in the near future.
Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

Housing starts generally are a better leading indicator than housing permits because "housing starts turn into homes for sale very quickly," Gabriel says.

The homebuilders association's Web site offers access to a wealth of forecasts and economic and housing data from the association and government agencies.

Employment trends show expanding areas

Markstein also cites local employment trends and unemployment rates as important indicators of local housing-market conditions.

"Employment is important because ultimately people need a place to live, and if people are moving into an area because employment is expanding, that will be positive for homeowners," he says.

Most local newspapers publish stories about large employers' hiring and downsizing plans as well as unemployment figures. Employment data also can be obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Video: Real-estate deals for $200,000 and up

Homebuyers and sellers can also glean useful insights from reports and newsletters published by the Federal Reserve and its 12 district banks, Markstein suggests. Each of the banks puts out its own periodicals about local economic conditions, and these reports usually contain sections about the outlook for commercial and residential real estate. The Fed's Beige Book and map of the district banks may help you locate these reports.

Quality of data is crucial to good analysis

Much like do-it-yourself remodeling, personal economic analysis is not without certain pitfalls.

Risks of do-it-yourself analysis include:

  • Inaccurate, incomplete, faulty or outdated data, which may be misleading.
  • Small surveys, which may suffer from sampling errors.
  • Individual data points, which may not represent a true trend line.

It's important to track inventory, starts, unemployment and other figures over time and compare them to historical highs, lows and averages to understand their importance, Gabriel suggests.

"Look at these numbers relative to the typical level that would exist in a period of economic growth to see whether the levels are aberrantly high or aberrantly low. Look over a long time frame and measure existing levels relative to, say, a long-run average to get a sense of where (the market) is in the cycle," he says.

And remember: In housing markets, "a long time frame" usually means a number of years, not just a few months.

This article was reported by Marcie Geffner for Bankrate.com.

Published Nov. 11, 2009

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 106
Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:09:54 AM
Why not provide some data not just links...Thumbs down
Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:22:58 AM
lest we forget, there is a correlation/cause and effect relationship between median salary and median home price.  salaries continue to decline as the nation's manufacturing base is being outsourced (read cannibalized) by our business leadership.
Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:16:14 AM
We will go right back into depression if gas and oil prices continue to rise. We also need to stop sending good jobs overseas which is the main problem. None of us can compete with a China worker making a dollar a day. Until we get fair (not free) trade we're on a slippery backward slope. Then when the gas prices rise, we will go right back into these depressions. 
Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:27:50 AM

Lenders have a vested interest in maintaining price supports and consequently their own portfolios. Nothing would make them happier then if prices could go up into infinity. Unfortunately, there is no infinity in a closed environment. If lenders are left to their own inclinations prices will always be pushed and maintained above the affordable equilibrium of the masses to the profit maximizing equilibrium for the lenders.

 

When you think of land lords as care takers for the lenders you realize that lenders have no interest in providing home ownership to the masses because they are already controlling/profit maximizing that portion of the housing market. This is why we spend so much for housing, why so many people must rent, and why prices always seem just out of reach.

 

Sales price should be the determining factor of affordability. When you buy with credit, monthly payments become the determining factor of affordability. Sales price can now be manipulated by the terms of the lenders. By acting in collusion or through a centralized clearing house (fanny may and fredi mac) the control at times can become absolute.   

 

Constant and excessive appreciations are not signs of a free market. Houses are depreciating assets that ware out and/or become functionally obsolete. If a house is holding a new construction price after ten years of neglect then there is something wrong with that market. This is where the price theory of supply and demand for a substitutable commodity like corn is bastardized to cover a dirty little secret. We don’t have a free market in housing. It is manipulate at so many levels that it is not even funny. Money supply, lending practices, and government interventions are all necessary to maintain price supports so the lenders portfolios don’t get in trouble.

 

When will the housing market recover? Two possibilities, when we go to a cash basis or when the bankers regain control. 

Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:42:01 AM

I'm going to have to play the Devils Advocate here.  I don't post things very often, but here goes.  For a long time I have been reading posts in all types of media about how we have lost all of the good paying jobs in manufacturing to overseas sources.  Maybe we might want to think about it this way: Were these "good paying jobs" really OVER PAID JOBS?  I have worked in manufacturing for 30 years, and have seen so much inefficiency (particularly in the automotive industry) it is almost unbelievable.

 

Maybe we need to consider what is a fair compensation.  I don't for a moment think that some of the compensation that is given in the financial sector is "fair".  However, if you add it all up, what is the total they receive when compared to the total?

 

We have lived high on the hog for a long time.  More than a decade ago people who ran a floor sweeper in the auto plants could make over 55K.  Those days in manufacturing are gone forever.

Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:05:05 AM

SeaSwine:

 

Things were better years ago when we ALL made better money. Why do some of us have to be labor slaves and live like the dollar a day China worker? Why can't we all make a good wage and have a decent life? To please you? Your answer is we make less money and live hard? Kind of self serving and narrow minded.

 

You're right it's better if you don't post.

Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:05:36 AM

The cash and carry trade is what you should be looking at. It is one of the primary economic engines dismantling our economy at the moment. Globalists are using tax payer subsidized interest rates to fund our competition. Once again Wall Street is playing a pivotable roll in the further dismantling of our economy.

Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:53:53 PM
If you were working for a commision on the sale, wouldn't you want to get the highest price possible for what you were selling...
Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:00:15 PM

Walleyeman:

Since by your post, you obviously haven't traveled outside your little corner of Dog Patch, USA to see that in fact, we American's don't live a very hard life and that we in fact do live a comfortable life and make good wages compaired to most of the world.

 

Most of the world do not own their own home, live in squaller and are lucky to be able to feed their family. You really do need to get out and see and experience the world before making your ill-informed comments.

 

You sir are stuck in the past when the "Good old days" you lived in weren't so good as you think. Yes gas was 25 cents a gallon, but your wage for the year was $9,500. Your wage now should be $65,000 but gas is only $2.50 a gallon. By percentage your gas cost more then than it does now. But you (and me) lived with the threat of nuclear extinction and air raid sirens and black-out curtains back in the "Good old days".

 

 

Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:24:07 PM
#9
Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:00:15 PM

Walleyeman:

Since by your post, you obviously haven't traveled outside your little corner of Dog Patch, USA to see that in fact, we American's don't live a very hard life and that we in fact do live a comfortable life and make good wages compaired to most of the world.

 

Most of the world do not own their own home, live in squaller and are lucky to be able to feed their family. You really do need to get out and see and experience the world before making your ill-informed comments.

 

You sir are stuck in the past when the "Good old days" you lived in weren't so good as you think. Yes gas was 25 cents a gallon, but your wage for the year was $9,500. Your wage now should be $65,000 but gas is only $2.50 a gallon. By percentage your gas cost more then than it does now. But you (and me) lived with the threat of nuclear extinction and air raid sirens and black-out curtains back in the "Good old days".

I've done a fair amount of traveling and I've been to some primitive countries. Sorry, I don't get your point.

 

Are you saying that because there are worst places to live that it is OK to create a third world nation here?

 

They have forced us down a path the vast majority of us would never have chosen on our own. There are engineers in this country that are out of work because they were replaced by H1b visas. There are assembly line workers who are out of work because their jobs were off shored.

 

Through out our history there has not been a shortage of sociopaths willing to externalize their costs of doing business on others. We became a nation of laws to protect the victims. Engineering and manufacturing jobs are national treasures. They are the wealth spring of any country. The elite believe that these treasures are theirs to do as they wish. If they continue on their current path they will learn otherwise.

 

You can't destroy the people of a country and still expect them to protect your assets abroad. Protection is cost prohibitive. Externalizing the costs on the US citizens will only work for so long. 

 

As for your fear analogy, the elite have to have something for the useful idiots to focus on. Nuclear extinction or terrorists it really doesn't matter. In the end it is always an excuse to get us to pay for their protection and imperialist pursuits. In the next couple of election cycles the American people will eventually put an end to the nonsense.

 

I'm a conservative American. I want to conserve the American way of life for future generations. You can say that I'm stuck in the past if you like, but in case you have noticed we are in trouble. The "Dream" is slipping away or I should say being stolen from our grand children by a bunch selfish jerks with bankrupted ideals.

1 - 10 of 106
To add a comment, pleasesign in