Creditor © Corbis

The Basics

For sale: Your job history

A private database collects employment records for a third of US workers and sells that information to government agencies, lenders and other companies. Consumer advocates worry about the data's security.


The next time you apply for a loan or a new job, a lender or prospective employer might go online to access a database instead of calling your human resources department to verify your employment and income.

In most cases, they'll contact a St. Louis company called Talx, which has developed a service called The Work Number.

Companies, government agencies and creditors, such as credit card companies and mortgage lenders, have been using The Work Number for almost a decade, tapping into a database of about 165 million to 170 million individual records (an employee has a separate record for each employer) covering roughly a third of the U.S. work force, says Janet Ford, vice president of Talx, a subsidiary of credit bureau Equifax.

Employers use Talx to handle salary and employment verifications and, in turn, share their payroll information and often several years' worth of payroll records. Employees can challenge the accuracy of any information.

Participating companies submit payroll information every time they process paychecks, Ford says. "So the data is as fresh as the last time they ran payroll," she says.

A company has to go through a credentialing process before it can access the database, says Ford, who adds that the majority of users are businesses attempting to grant credit or government agencies attempting to grant benefits.

Employers pay a fee for Talx to store the data and to respond to employment and salary inquiries. They can also elect to receive a monthly report with the Social Security numbers of their own employees whose records were accessed, the date of the request and what type of records (salary or employment history) were viewed, says Ford. But employers are never told who is making the request or why, she says.

Companies, including would-be creditors, that make inquiries pay to access the data, which costs from $12.50 to $31 per employee, depending on the number and type of records sought, Ford says. To access salary information, companies need the employee's permission.

Employment verification data include the company name, the employee's job title, whether the employee is active or inactive, the start date, the most recent hire date and the total length of time with the company, Ford says.

Salary inquiries include the same information, along with pay rate and frequency, year-to-date earnings and two years' wages, she says. To access a work history, a company must provide the employee's Social Security number and a legitimate reason for the inquiry.

"We are a conduit to efficiently and electronically provide this information to verifiers who need it from employers who have it," Ford says.

What about security?

Some consumer advocates and privacy experts worry about the security of databases storing personal financial information.

A database like The Work Number that uses online interaction can be "a significant convenience for employers and employees," says Peter Swire, a law professor at Ohio State University and senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a Washington, D.C., think tank.

At the same time, "the size of the database makes it a big, new target," he says. Besides the risks of insider abuse and identity theft, he says, "it's also a tempting target for government investigations and discovery in lawsuits."

"The first rule of databases is, 'If you build it, they will come,'" Swire says.

And a Social Security number isn't the big secret a lot of people assume it is, he says. "For millions of Americans, their Social Security number is up on the Web. So using a Social Security number as a 'secret' is bad security."

Still, online and electronic systems "for better or for worse, make background checks easier," Swire says.

Continued: 'A reality of our age'

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh